attack blogs, naked pics, fake comments, and indi padashow samarajiva's hypocrisy and online thuggery

as readers of sl blogs may have noticed a particular blog (named after the loser who did not marry jane austen) has taken to attacking me on a regular basis. even during last few weeks during which i was inactive. also note that up to now i have not made any reference to that blog here in spite of repeated attacks.

i am documenting that blog in detail, with screen shots etc. perhaps if i find it necessary i will make a more detailed exposure in the future but some recent comments there from some third parties, prompted me to write this post as a clarification.

[ i will also point out absurdities in an attempt made by indi samarajiva to disclaim his padashow identity in a note below]

attacks



the above screenshot (intentionally blurred by me) is an example of attacks made on me.

do the few bloggers who recently made (authentic) appreciative comments in that blog approve this tactic? they should answer. it will be unfortunate (i promise them that) if they do not make their disapproval explicit.

in addition to posting naked pics of unknown males falsely entitled sittingnut, the attacks made against me there range widely; to unjustified abusive ignorant silly lies (all the way from 'forty something' to 'pedophile'!, lol ), to claims about alleged content of my statcounter account, to censorship of comments, etc. etc.

to be fair, once in while what appear to be straight forward arguments against what i say in this blog are also made, though closer examination show blatantly distorted quotations and lies. in those posts given the need to cover the truth of what i actually said, there is no link backs or screenshots of my posts criticized. most of my attempt to expose the lies and provide the links were censored.

fake comments
recently blog also features fake comments under the name sittingnut

only comments i made in that blog in recent weeks merely detailed the attacks made on me there, and that blog's connection with indi padashow samarajiva. i will continue to repost that rather lengthy comment even though it is continually censored and substituted by fake comments. all other comments under sittingnut there are fake.

this is of course typical of ppl like indi padashow and sanjana hattotuwa who used similar tactic in now deleted moju blog when i exposed a ngo plagiarism in 2006. they don't have anything solid to attack me so they make up things and use such blogs and tactics to spew them out.

such attacks merely confirm their inborn inadequacies, irrationality, and moral bankruptcy.

of course most ppl will recognize the fake comments but there are born idiots who don't; such as the blogger who goes by the name of chavie. who actually started arguing with the content of a fake comment under the name sittingnut there. this chavie is known among other things to be slavish devotee of rahan samarajiva father of indi. as they say there is no cure for stupidity.

btw i will consider any blogger who makes any authentic appreciative comment there as approving attack tactics used in that blog. (this is of course valid only after after the attacks started.)

indi padashow samarajiva connection
that attack blog, actively promoted from the first day by sunday leader columnist and indi.ca blogger indi samarajiva (no stranger to such blogs given he runs padashow blog. see note below on latest laughable attempt of indi disclaiming his padashow identity) started attacking me in a vicious way only after i exposed indi padashow's hypocrisy, paid unp propaganda, and corrupt political connections, during presidential elections. all those claims by me were based on evidence so cannot be disproved. you will also notice that it is not attacking other bloggers who may share some of my political views objected to there, but then those other bloggers did not expose indi padashow samarajiva, son of corrupt (at the very least by the same standards that indi claim others as corrupt) former political appointee rohan samarajiva.

i will also point out the double standard in kottu run by indi padashow, which, in contrast to referred attack blog, banned among others, tamilnet.tv blog, bc it used some of the same tactics to attack tamil tiger terrorists and their supporters.

btw i am not recommending any ban on any blog even ones that attack me in vicious ways, rather pointing out that kottu run by indi samarajiva has clear double standard. guess why? :-) in fact i would not be surprised if if i get kicked off kottu but blogs that post fake naked pics to attack what indi's consider his opponents remain in kottu.

the blogger concerned is also very active in posting comments in other blogs defending indi padashow samarajiva and his father .

online thuggery
if indi padashow samarajiva and his suckerboys think that such a pathetic attempt at online thuggery will prevent me from exposing their hypocrisy and corruption with evidence they are sadly mistaken. lol

i am also happy to note that it has not prevented at least one other blogger from raising some questions about conduct indi padashow in another blog. but then again, such attacks on me, may have intimidated others who remain silent due to fear of offending indi and his suckerboys.

to counter that probability by indicating that i will continue to be active, and to dispel any future claim to cluelessness on the part of moronic third parties like chavie and timeseye who appreciate the forgeries in that blog is the reason for this post.

as i always say, i appreciate the usefulness of sunlight to confound liars and cowardly thugs.

෴

note
refuting indi samarajiva's silly attempt to disclaim his padashow identity

indi samarajiva while defending his 'good name' (lol) in indi.ca from some charges made in another blog claims rather irrelevantly that my identification of him with padashow blogger was a mistake due to his making some joke that padashow made.

not so. and he knows that.

that is why he will not publish my reply comment to his claim. (other comments after mine were published while mine is yet to appear. i delayed this post on purpose to make sure of this. hence the screenshot instead of link )


(click to enlarge)

while (as i made clear from from first) my identification of indi with padashow was not dependent solely on both making same 'joke' as he implies, it should be pointed out that even the claim he makes above can be disproved.

fact is, the alleged 'public' incident that resulted in the 'joke' did not occur as he describe it now or when he first made the claim. as such to claim 'that information was pretty much public' is absurd. lol

even the details he try use to support the alleged 'public' incident actually support the fact it was a lie. i was indeed in the audience of some play that some other blogger referred was playing in. but the play was at a different theater than the one referred to in original 'joke'. so he was not 'at a public play' where i was at. (if anyone else is interested (why?) these facts can be easily checked through visiting the actor's blog, padashow blog, and indi.ca blog at the time. i am course not linking to false 'jokes')

why would anybody use totally wrong locality when describing an allegedly eye witnessed incident? and why would 'public information' get the name of theater so wrong? lol

that is just one of obvious falsehoods. there are lot of other details he got wrong but which would violate privacy of third parties to disprove in detail here. obviously he is spewing falsehoods or his 'friend' fed him falsehoods for some unknown reasons. lol. i will leave third parties out since they have not made 'jokes'.

iow indi made most of it up.
funny thing was person who writes padashow blog made up the exact same thing almost 12 months before him.

lol.
lol indeed!

why would two different ppl make up same detailed falsehood? wrong in both the main fact and in details? year apart too? nor was he merely repeating it after padashow (as some other bloggers did long afterward), bc (1) he disclaims that himself , and (2) he differs in some minor detail from padashow's story.

no! the 'joke' was coming out of same birdbrain full of some rather ignorant and strange misconceptions and prejudices about me and my situation is life, and like all liars' brains forgets the details of his own lies every time he repeats it .

so quite apart from other facts that identify indi samarajiva with padashow, this clumsy attempt at disproving it only help confirm the identification.


my twitter - http://twitter.com/sittingnut
this blog's twitter - http://twitter.com/llibertarian

challenge: name a single real news story that was censored in sri lanka recently

opposition propagandists and terrorist propagandists claim that sri lankans are not informed about what is happening in sri lanka bc news here is censored.

imo that is not so.

it can be argued, that not a single real news story, that would have passed a good editor in any reputable newspaper in west, was censored here.

please prove me wrong if you can.

as i always say to anyone who claims sri lankans are kept in the dark by government, go to the nearest newsstand (there are plenty everywhere ) and just read the headlines. not only real news, but unsubstantiated substandard stories, pro and against government/opposition/whatever are available to anyone. same with other media.

yes there was no story about election commissioner held at gun point on 27th, but that was not censorship, bc that never happened. same with sore loser sarath fonseka being 'under siege' and 'hotel arrest'.



to claim that these rumors were spread bc there was censorship of in mainstream independent media and there is a vacuum of information as one of official online unp/sf propagandists, indi 'padashow' samarajiva', does is false.

far from 'running media center for national security press releases', mainstream media in sl did report the facts truthfully. the false rumors were artificially created and spread on purpose to denigrate and undermine sri lanka and its democracy. indi padashow participated in that effort willingly and knowingly. he is now acting the sore loser like his masters' bc his artificial bubble of clueless hopes have burst.

my challenge to him or any anyone else making the same false claims about censorship : name a single properly substantiated news story that was not published in sri lanka recently in context and in proportion to its news value.

-
does that mean there is no censorship in sri lanka? no.

attempts at censorship (mostly ineffective) directed against false anti sri lanka propaganda did and is taking place. government is quite open about it.

government blocked the terrorist propaganda website, tamilnet in 2007. some of those who were spreading false rumors through sms texts in bulk on 25th and 27th clearly aimed at denigrating and undermining sri lanka, national security, and sri lankan democracy at that particular point of time have been arrested. formerly terrorist jvp's propaganda rag lanka raided and shut for a day was due to it publishing an article inimical to national security.

note that there was nothing unconstitutional or illegal in any of government actions. for example, police who raided lanka followed proper legal procedure and were armed with court orders, search warrants, etc. same court also allowed the paper to reopen.

however i would support use of legal force only if these ppl were either intending to use force, conspiring with those who did, or somehow engaging in activities that could very well result in harm to sri lankans (such as disclosing details of intelligence operations as alleged about lanka article). since investigations are continuing we don't know enough to judge specifically about recent actions.

-
i personally do not approve any kind of censorship, of news or of propaganda.

i believe in countering false propaganda by exposing the propagandists and their real loyalties to the world with evidence.

that is why when government blocked the terrorist propaganda website, tamilnet, i protested. even though i detest what that website is doing. i also helped literally thousands of ppl to counter the block bc my post is in top 10/20 search results for relevant keywords in google.lk. (btw one of the reasons this blog gets so many visitors is that i have posted lot of practically useful posts in the past).

similarly i have never called for banning corrupt peacenik sanjana hattotuwa's groundviews blog or its predecessor moju. even though both published blatantly untrue terrorist propaganda.

i believe in exposing their lies to sunlight through confronting them with facts and reason. aggressively so.

if the propagandists are allied to terrorists, their pro terrorist connections and lies should be exposed, whether they be tamilnet or groundviews. their racist ideologies and prejudices should be laid bare. eventually truth will triumph. tamilnet has lost all credibility. these days ppl visit it only to know how the terrorist pussies are spinning a particular story, not for facts. moju was deleted by sanjana when the criminal burden of its terrorist parroting lies became too much to sustain. note how sanjana hattotuwa is not maintaining an archive copy of moju site (even though he is maintaining such for various others).

if the propagandists were working to undermine national security and sri lankan democracy, and their actions do not go beyond mere propaganda, i would support and be satisfied with any effort to expose their lies and connections.

so when one of the online unp/sf propagandists, blogger indi 'padashow' samarajiva and same terrorist parrot sanjana hattotuwa' and their suckerboys like dinidu de alwis began to spread false rumors in blogosphere and in twitter on 25th and 27th (complementing their colleagues who were spreading the same lies in bulk offline through sms text etc.) principled thing to do was to expose them for what they are, as i said at the time.

in fact exposure of their lies, hypocrisy, bias and loyalties, based on their actions and facts should continue as long as they continue to engage in propaganda.


to conclude,

there is no news censorship in sri lanka, there was/are legal attempts underway to curb propagandist who may be undermining national security and democracy.

i do not believe in curbing even propagandists as long as they are nothing but propagandists. best way to counter propagandists is to expose them, their connections, and confront them with facts and reason .

෴

ps
on purely personal scale, with regard to censorship, i have not even called for removal of unp propagandist indi 'padashow' samarajiva's online thuggery against me, conducted through a second hand blog at present, from even kottu.

i have satisfied myself (in addition to documenting his disgusting activity for record purposes) with pointing out the hypocrisy and double standards indi.padashow applies to those who do his dirty work, in contrast to treatment meted out to those who used similar tactics against terrorists. former is encouraged and promoted while latter, like satire site tamilnet.tv, are banned from kottu.

wonder what indi 'padashow' samarajiva's kottu cocoon defenders have to say about this double standard.

my twitter - http://twitter.com/sittingnut
this blog's twitter - http://twitter.com/llibertarian

calling all conspiracy theorists: conspiracy theory needed to explain why "sinhalese government" want to hold "tamils" in "concentration camps"

sanjana hattotuwa (groundviews/infoshare) will give not 1 but 2 cameras for a successful conspiracy theory that explains why "sinhalese government" want to keep "tamils" in "illegal" "concentration camps"/"gulags" "indefinitely". furthermore since such a prize was deemed to be unethical and seem pander to selfishness, he would also donate big macs to next "tamil" "hunger striker" in britain protesting "sinhalese" government's treatment of tamils. by participating you can be both selfish and selflessly help the "cause" at the same time.while others mainly from formerly peacenik ngo community ranging from sanjana hattotuwa to indi.padashow have more or less accused government of wanting to keep "tamils" in "concentration camps"/"prisons" "indefinitely" they have failed to answer the question "why?". what does "sinhalese government" expect from this massive and expensive effort to keep 300,000 "tamils" in "gulags"?

your theory must answer that question bc others have failed miserably (so miserably that they are reduced to censoring "nuts" asking "why?" whenever they say this.) you must help stop their misery.

are the "tamils" going to be killed in a genocide? or sold in to slavery perhaps?

let your imagination run wild in order to effectively counter "propaganda" by "sinhalese government".
government claims that, what it calls "welfare villages", are required to house internally displaced persons (idp) until, damaged infrastructure is rebuilt (you know roads, schools, and police stations, etc.), land mines are cleared, and what they call "tamil tiger terrorist murderers" who have infiltrated are screened out. yes, nobody dedicated to the "cause" believes any of that; after all ltte selflessly developed infrastructure, never laid a mine, and all of them were martyred with their sainted leader. that, as sanjana hathutuwa testifies daily, is the holy truth . but remember average person is an idiot and easily misled by the might of highly competent "sinhalese government's" propaganda machine; look at the election results.

so help provide the "why"! help likes of sanjana hattotuwa to face that question "why" unflinchingly in future!

in addition to providing a comprehensive answer to the "why", the successful theory must follow the guidelines below. (read any post in groundviews.org or indi.ca on the subject, and observe how scrupulously they follow these guidelines.)

• ignore the legality of camps and their similarity to others camps for displaced people in emergency situations. you must try to make it appear that they are illegal by calling them "illegal" repeatedly and referring to ppl there as "imprisoned".
• you must always refer to what sri lankan government call "welfare villages" as "concentration camps". or if it is impossible to make the analogy given the total dissimilarity between say nazi concentration camps and these, you should refer to them as "camps similar to ones where united states government interned japanese americans during world war II", or "internment camps" for short. never mind that here too there are no similarities. most ppl have no idea about american incident, and you are free to assume that those who fall for conspiracy theories like this will not bother to check the accuracy of this analogy.
• you must not refer to the fact that hundreds of thousands "tamils" in east were resettled by the "sinhalese government". ignore the fact they too lived for months in "internment camps" before being resettled. you must completely ignore those camps and ppl, bc making any comparison will be counterproductive to success of conspiracy theory. follow the great example of indi.padashow who once railed against government for existence of 600,000 displaced in east (in reality fellow-traveler-for-the-cause, indi exaggerated, it was less than half of that), but who now deliberately ignore the government's resettlement of vast majority of them so that he can rail against government for keeping 300,000 displaced in camps in north. selective amnesia is a must for any self respecting conspiracy theorist.
• you are free make use of your imagination to exaggerate, or simply make up, the sufferings of "tamils" in these "internment camps". you can say they are malnourished (ignore all facts pointing otherwise and lack of food riots etc.); you can say they have no medicines ( ignore that there is no record of any above average incidents of disease, or any outbreaks of epidemics, so common in other emergency camps) , you can say there are abuses of all kinds (you don't have to substantiate any of them) , exaggerate the flooding ( ignore that it was minor and all those affected were quickly given shelter. do not refer to the fact that thousands of sri lankans outside the "camps"who were more severely affected by flooding (in this case and annually) would count it lucky to receive even half of the care given to those inside. etc etc.)
• you must not refer to active involvement of various united nations agencies in the management and funding of these "illegal prisons" as in other camps around the world from italy to africa . you have to ensure that questions like the following do not pop up in minds of consumers of the conspiracy theory; "if they are illegal and sinister, why is united nations paying for them?". while ppl receptive to such theories are on average ... idiots, that is no guarantee that such questions will not occur even to them.
• you must refer to ppl in camps as "tamils" without any qualifications and imply this is the fate of all tamils in sri lanka . on no account should you refer to millions of other tamils living in sri lanka who are not "imprisoned ".
• sri lankan government should be always referred to as either "sinhalese government" or "sinhalese dominated government". fact that majority of freely elected parliamentarians from all minority communities in sri lanka are in government should be ignored. do not even mention the "traitors" in tna once closely associated with our "departed comrades" and other militant groups, but now cooperating with government.
• you should make sure to imply that motives of people in sri lanka are primarily defined by their race. you must imply that almost all "sinhalese" support the "genocidal" intentions of government, while tamils always support of "freedom fighting" tamil tigers. try to generate sympathy for people like sanjana hattotuwa, a sinhalese ( as he keeps on repeating) "branded" as a "traitor" by "sinhalese" for supporting, believing in, and parroting "tamil tiger freedom fighters".
• on no account should you imply that ppl opposed to ltte have motives other than "genocide" of "tamils". ignore or if possible denigrate their other stated motives; such as support for a realistic sustainable peace (achieved by defeating an armed criminal gang), bringing justice, ensuring human rights for all (including right to life), giving everyone ability to freely elect representatives to sri lankan democracy, etc. etc .

judges:
pilrukshi pissunnetti (not to be confused with dilrukshi handunnetti)
shamtvi boiled (not to be confused with sharmini boyle)
assman pathsekera (not to be confused with lakshman gunasekera)
balaka gandawardene (not to be confused with nalaka gunawardene)
screech scroor (not to be confused with shreen saroor)

anyway follow the guidelines and win the prize! and don't forget the big macs for the hunger striker!


note
i know that in the past some ppl ( notably david blacker "the novelist" lol) have demonstrated an inability to understand the meaning of posts like above. hence this note. do you get it now?

note 2
i have explained my real thoughts on idp camps several times elsewhere, but not in a post in this blog, so here is a brief,

i think screening for ltte operatives should be expedited and camps should be closed. ppl in them should be allowed to fend for themselves with no, or at most minimal, assistance. let them take their chances with failed infrastructure and land mines. government and other sri lankans are not obligated to provide welfare to these ppl over and above what others receive. i am in fact opposed to all welfare.

i think current sl government is acting in good faith but misguided. like all leftist governments they think they are doing good by trying to provide welfare to these ppl. they are wasting money in reality. they are unintentionally creating a dependant mindset, as they did with some victims of tsunami (few of those linger on camps even now to receive government welfare).

i also think that there is some individual corruption (always there when politicians and their appointees are allowed to spend public money), some purely political motives (to create a base for ruling party's political allies by "winning hearts and minds", and creating patronage relationships), and lots of red tape.

as such, i think sincere critics of these idp camps should focus on corruption, politics, and red tape involved, and ditch the silly conspiracy theories. no chance of that happening with insincere critics like sanjana or indi.

෴

my twitter - http://twitter.com/sittingnut
this blog's twitter - http://twitter.com/llibertarian

news - uk government freed lockerbie terrorist "for oil" - same hypocrites preach to us about justice & human rights?

leaked letters by british justice secretary jack straw published yesterday has revealed that it was in fact uk government (as opposed to merely the scottish one as was originally claimed) that agreed to release of the convicted lockerbie bomber, abdelbaset ali mohmed al megrahi. release was linked to finalization of a libyan oil deal for british oil company bp.

sri lankans who have their eyes and ears open are certainly not surprised that british did another despicable blood for money, anti justice, anti human rights, deal. it is what they have always done with regard to tamil tiger terrorist murderers. they let organized racists affiliated with ltte to collect money unhindered, they support terrorist parroting ngos, they have failed to prevent, investigate, prosecute, or even condemn, racists in britain for hate mongering and attacking sri lankans there, and we know what happened during last days of terrorist pussies, british foreign secretary david miliband rushed here to save the mass murderers and with others called for a ceasefire to let murderers breath again.

all this resulted in more death and suffering to us, sri lankans.

all this was done to pander to large tamil diaspora (in which racist voices, affiliated with terrorists and supported by violence, drown out others) there. some labour party politicians in particular are dependent on diaspora support to get elected, especially since polls point to a defeat for labour party in coming election. same motives, now in the form ratings and ads, drive some media there to publish unverified and unsubstantiated fables to slander sri lanka and inflame racist hate against sri lankans.

while this travesty of justice with regard to lockerbie bomber was rightly exposed, the same media will not expose british sheltering and financing of tamil tiger terrorist murderers. lockerbie victims, mostly americans, and their friends, have influence (thank god) to balance interests of some uk politicians and businesses, we sri lankans have no such influence and unlikely to have any, as long as that racist dominated tamil diaspora can command votes and sri lanka is still a developing country.

that is why we sri lankans will do well not to expect justice and fairness from united kingdom in the near future, we can only expect hate, harm, and injustice, whatever we do.

we should not pander to their politicians or media as some born slaves here sometimes recommend by giving them access or by giving supposedly independent foreigners to investigate and judge human right cases here. they will not be independent and we will not get justice.

instead we should aggressively and frankly confront them with facts and ask them to substantiate their claims. we should not hesitate to expose their real motives and hypocrisy.

we sri lankans should not let these shameless hypocritical british helpers of terrorist murderers to preach to us about justice and human rights, uncontested.

෴

ps
of course we should also aggressively confront and expose the slaves (sometimes paid slaves) of these foreigners here, from paikiasothy saravanamuttu to sunila abeysekera, from sanjana hattotuwa, to indi padshow. they should be asked (at the risk of censorship, and in spite of the fact that they will not dare reply in any place where freedom of expression prevail) to explain why their stances in various sri lankan issues always seem to flow harmoniously with those of racist terrorists and their foreign supporters, instead of with substantiated facts and principles of justice, human rights, democracy, and freedom.

my twitter - http://twitter.com/sittingnut
this blog's twitter - http://twitter.com/llibertarian