i am documenting that blog in detail, with screen shots etc. perhaps if i find it necessary i will make a more detailed exposure in the future but some recent comments there from some third parties, prompted me to write this post as a clarification.
[ i will also point out
absurdities in an attempt made by indi samarajiva to disclaim his padashow identity in a note below]
attacks
the above screenshot (intentionally blurred by me) is an example of attacks made on me.
do the few bloggers who recently made (authentic) appreciative comments in that blog approve this tactic? they should answer. it will be unfortunate (i promise them that) if they do not make their disapproval explicit.
in addition to posting naked pics of unknown males falsely entitled sittingnut,
the attacks made against me there range widely; to unjustified abusive ignorant silly lies (all the way from 'forty something' to 'pedophile'!, lol ), to claims about alleged content of my statcounter account, to censorship of comments, etc. etc.
to be fair, once in while what appear to be straight forward arguments against what i say in this blog are also made, though closer examination show
blatantly distorted quotations and lies. in those posts given the need to cover the truth of what i actually said, there is no link backs or screenshots of my posts criticized. most of my attempt to expose the lies and provide the links were censored.
fake commentsrecently blog also features fake comments under the name sittingnut
only comments i made in that blog in recent weeks merely detailed the attacks made on me there, and that blog's connection with indi padashow samarajiva. i will continue to repost that rather lengthy comment even though it is continually censored and substituted by fake comments.
all other comments under sittingnut there are fake.this is of course typical of ppl like indi padashow and sanjana hattotuwa who
used similar tactic in now deleted moju blog when i exposed a ngo plagiarism in 2006.
they don't have anything solid to attack me so they make up things and use such blogs and tactics to spew them out.such attacks merely confirm their inborn inadequacies, irrationality, and moral bankruptcy.of course most ppl will recognize the fake comments but there are born idiots who don't; such as the blogger who goes by the name of
chavie. who actually started arguing with the content of a fake comment under the name sittingnut there. this chavie is known among other things to be slavish devotee of rahan samarajiva father of indi.
as they say there is no cure for stupidity.
btw
i will consider any blogger who makes any authentic appreciative comment there as approving attack tactics used in that blog. (this is of course valid only after after the attacks started.)indi padashow samarajiva connectionthat attack blog,
actively promoted from the first day by sunday leader columnist and indi.ca blogger
indi samarajiva (no stranger to such blogs given he runs padashow blog. see note below on latest laughable attempt of indi disclaiming his padashow identity)
started attacking me in a vicious way only after i exposed indi padashow's hypocrisy, paid unp propaganda, and corrupt political connections, during presidential elections. all those claims by me were based on evidence so cannot be disproved. you will also notice that it is not attacking other bloggers who may share some of my political views objected to there, but then those other bloggers did not expose indi padashow samarajiva, son of corrupt (at the very least by the same standards that indi claim others as corrupt) former political appointee rohan samarajiva.
i will also point out
the double standard in kottu run by indi padashow, which, in contrast to referred attack blog, banned among others,
tamilnet.tv blog, bc it used some of the same tactics to attack tamil tiger terrorists and their supporters.
btw
i am not recommending any ban on any blog even ones that attack me in vicious ways, rather pointing out that kottu run by indi samarajiva has clear double standard. guess why? :-) in fact i would not be surprised if if i get kicked off kottu but blogs that post fake naked pics to attack what indi's consider his opponents remain in kottu.
the blogger concerned is also very active in posting comments in other blogs defending indi padashow samarajiva and his father .
online thuggeryif indi padashow samarajiva and his suckerboys think that such a pathetic attempt at online thuggery will prevent me from exposing their hypocrisy and corruption with evidence they are sadly mistaken. lol
i am also happy to note that it has not prevented at least
one other blogger from raising some questions about conduct indi padashow in another blog. but then again, such attacks on me,
may have intimidated others who remain silent due to fear of offending indi and his suckerboys.to counter that probability by indicating that i will continue to be active, and to dispel any future claim to cluelessness on the part of moronic third parties like
chavie and
timeseye who appreciate the forgeries in that blog is the reason for this post.
as i always say,
i appreciate the usefulness of sunlight to confound liars and cowardly thugs. noterefuting indi samarajiva's silly attempt to disclaim his padashow identity
indi samarajiva while defending his 'good name' (lol) in indi.ca from some charges made in another blog claims rather irrelevantly that my identification of him with padashow blogger was a mistake due to his making some joke that padashow made.
not so. and he knows that.
that is why
he will not publish my reply comment to his claim. (other comments after mine were published while mine is yet to appear. i delayed this post on purpose to make sure of this. hence the screenshot instead of link )
(click to enlarge)while (as i made clear from from first) my identification of indi with padashow was not dependent solely on both making same 'joke' as he implies, it should be pointed out that even the claim he makes above can be disproved.
fact is, the alleged 'public' incident that resulted in the 'joke' did not occur as he describe it now or when he first made the claim. as such to claim 'that information was pretty much public' is absurd. lol
even the details he try use to support the alleged 'public' incident actually support the fact it was a lie. i was indeed in the audience of some play that some other blogger referred was playing in. but the play was at a different theater than the one referred to in original 'joke'. so he was not 'at a public play' where i was at. (if anyone else is interested (why?) these facts can be easily checked through visiting the actor's blog, padashow blog, and indi.ca blog at the time. i am course not linking to false 'jokes')
why would anybody use totally wrong locality when describing an allegedly eye witnessed incident? and why would 'public information' get the name of theater so wrong? lolthat is just one of obvious falsehoods. there are lot of other details he got wrong but which would violate privacy of third parties to disprove in detail here.
obviously he is spewing falsehoods or his 'friend' fed him falsehoods for some unknown reasons. lol. i will leave third parties out since they have not made 'jokes'.
iow
indi made most of it up.funny thing was
person who writes padashow blog made up the exact same thing almost 12 months before him.
lol.
lol indeed!
why would two different ppl make up same detailed falsehood? wrong in both the main fact and in details? year apart too? nor was he merely repeating it after padashow (as some other bloggers did long afterward), bc (1) he disclaims that himself , and (2) he differs in some minor detail from padashow's story.
no! the 'joke' was coming out of same birdbrain full of some rather ignorant and strange misconceptions and prejudices about me and my situation is life, and like all liars' brains forgets the details of his own lies every time he repeats it .
so quite apart from other facts that identify indi samarajiva with padashow, this clumsy attempt at disproving it only help confirm the identification.my twitter - http://twitter.com/sittingnutthis blog's twitter - http://twitter.com/llibertarian 
