Saturday, November 03, 2007

terrorist pussy roasted!

murderous smiling pussy otherwise called thamilchelvan was killed during a sri lankan air force air raid on a terrorist camp.

and now i cannot wipe the smile off my face :-)

just four months ago roasted one said, after they were kicked out of east, that "we will weaken the military capacity of the government of sri lanka, which will invariably end up hitting economic targets as well"

i along with great majority of sri lankans well aware of the sri lankan reality asked "so what?" what else have these terrorists been doing for so long? but as usual terrorist parroting peaceniks wanted sri lankans to give into threats and appease terrorists in order to get 'peace'

no doubt now peaceniks will predictably say that death of thamilchelvan is a blow to peace and such other crap, forgetting what he actually said and did.

in fact peacenik jehan perera from national peace council (aka sacrifice- millions- of -ppl- to terrorist- oppression- so- we- can- engage- in- missionary- activity- in- 'peace' council) as usual acting as terrorist's back up spin unit has already said "the ltte will try to retaliate to even the score,'' (again we have to ask, "so what?". were they not trying to kill and attack everyone not in ltte before?) `this will make peace talks harder to resume as tamilchelvan was the political face of the ltte ''

and another peacenik cum back up terrorist spokesman paikiasothy saravanamuttu of center for policy alternatives ( aka center - for- whitewashing- terrorist- atrocities- and- propagating- absurd- white- van- conspiracy -theories), said "that the assassination would vindicate the hard-liners on the rebel side...i would imagine the ltte . will want to hit back."(again so what? were they not doing so already?)

this peacenik criminal (btw he is not the peacenik accused of abusing his wife though that is exactly the sort of thing we can expect from him) who has a long record of excusing terrorist human right violations also said “they are now the mirror image of each other in every respect,” (meaning government and ltte) “they are both in zero-sum mode.” typical of this terrorist parrot to see a democratically elected government trying, as it is it is duty bound to do, to end the activities of a criminal gang, so long allowed to operate and violate human rights with impunity, and those criminals on an equal level. he has lost all sense of morality in his desire for terrorist money.

man do these hypocritical idiots live in a fantasy or what?

hope that big pussy will be dug out of his hole eventually. i am sure that like all cowardly bullies (saddam, wijeweera etc) he will surrender and give up his fellow pussies than get killed.

18 comments:

Anonymous said...

FK YOU

Anonymous said...

" One who advocates maximizing individual rights and minimizing the role of the state. 2. One who believes in free will."

Why the fk do you have this defintion posted on your Fk-en blog? You obviously are a fken hypocrite or you are an fk-er who cannot comprehend the words that are used in the fk-en definition!

Anonymous said...

Keep up the good work. We need to fry all these murderers, drug dealers, pussies for good. I am glad we are doing some thing after all these years. If we had done this 10 years ago, we could have wiped them out for good.
GOD Bless our troops who are sacrificing their lives to make our country a peaceful place.

Fk you to the other Fu-Kers who cannot accept the truth.

Anonymous said...

Great post.

Anonymous 2 - In Libertarianism the object is to lessen the 'role of the state' in terms of allowing the market to provide goods and services as required. This means striving to bring the public sector to bare necessities. Defence falls into the necessities of nationhood. Defence is a pure public good and exists to protect all citizens of a nation and its territorial integrity. Simply put, the market will never provide this service. No where in this post is any of these concepts being challenged? So this post reflects Libertarian thought.

Furthermore this post is a reflection of 'free will' more than the likes of you will ever fathom. It's a direct challenge to the pandering posts that fall in line with the mindless beating drum of the NGOs and Terrorists that is the scourge of the SL blogosphere.

Anonymous said...

He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword! A fate that will befall all people engaging in such activity.

Gahalaya said...

great post, thanks lanka libertarian for this.

Dear "FK" Anonymous,-
atleast Lanka Libertarian has a sceen name and he has been consistant in his excersise of free speech and has penned for protecting rights too in the past.
but you seems to be one of those so called 'civil society ' defeners of rights types as judging by the abuseinve languae you use to enforce your hegemony on 'we are the protectors of rights ' crap.

Angel said...

Well done, great post as usual. While I agree with the he who lives by the sword axion, I am deeply greatful to the armed forces who sacrifice today for a better tomorrow for all in SL.

Funny how pointless and profanity sprouting comentators need to hide behind an annon!

Anonymous said...

Straight from the horses mouth:

"Civil groups and the Catholic community condemn the killing of the rebel political leader by government forces."

http://www.asianews.it/index.php?l=en&art=10719&size=A

Yes, people were right when they said the Catholic church in SL is the cat's paw of the LTTE.

Anonymous said...

Nims,

Your interpretation of what the catholic church said is ridiculous. The following is what is said in the link you provided.

'Fr Reid Shelton Fernando, a Catholic priest and a political commentator, said that for Christians, the Tamil leader’s death like any other loss of life “whether it is that of a soldier or a rebel, is never a motive for rejoicing. We have a duty to reject the culture of death in favour of a culture of life.”'


All that has been done is express a true Christian sentiment. You dont rejoice in the killing of someone. Whatever that persons reputation or actions may have been.

The Christian or Catholic church has at no point stood for terrorism in the country. This is evident from the statement of the Arch Bishop of Cantebury when he visited. He said that the "govt has no choice but to surgically remove terrorist elements".

The Church cannot be judged by one or two individuals who voice their personal opinion on matters. The leadership of the church has always denounced violence and terrorism of any kind.

So you should first think about what you say before you say it, without displaying your blatant racism and utter ignorance.

Anonymous said...

What's fucking racist about pointing out the hypocrisy of the Catholic Church in Sri Lanka? Is the Catholic Church a separate race? No it ain't Mahen. Grow a fucking brain and get an education. Learn what racism actually means you fool.

Go read the link again. This is what the report says "Civil groups and the Catholic community condemn the killing of the rebel political leader by government forces."

Funny, nothing said when Kethesh Loganthan was killed, or when Lakshman Kadirgamar was killed. But hot tears and condemnations when this terrorist leader Tamilchelvam is killed.

The Catholic Church has stood for terrorism on numerous occasions. It has provided refuge to LTTE cadres, and acted as storage sites for weapons and ammunition. Catholic priests routinely give a clean chit to the LTTE while condemning the security forces. One pussy bishop from Mannar even left Sri Lankan policeman behind to the LTTE when they went in seach of a pedophile and didn't even mention them until people raised the issue of them being missing.

In fact, the Catholic Church has spilled the blood of more people than the LTTE and all other terror groups combined. The history of the Catholic Church is stained with the blood and guts of millions, including thousands in Sri Lanka who refused to convert when the Portuguese and their Catholic priests were busy trying to shove the religion down the throats of Sri Lankans.

"The leadership of the church has always denounced violence and terrorism of any kind."

What a laugh! They have been perpetrating violence and terrorism for a long, long time!


Bishop de Chickera goes off God's rails
http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/8008

Anonymous said...

Well if you don't want to call a person who discriminates people based on their spiritual beliefs and uses the actions of a stark minority to condemn the entire religion, a racist, then fine, call him a religionist or whatever other word that suits your fancy.

You're quoting the journalist's intepretation of what a catholic priest has said and conveniently avoiding the actual quotations by the priest involved in the first link given. Read it again. Read what the priest said.

Perhaps you weren't listening when Kethis Loganathan or Lakshman Kadirgamar were killed to the amount of condemnation the church had for it. If you are a Christian then you probably didnt attend church. If you aren't then you can be excused for not hearing. Ofcourse the journalists prefer to publish what little has been said about a member of the LTTE as it is far more fashionable and sensational.

Petty minded folk like you have no problems making it doubly sensational.

The people of Catholic and Hindu religions are ones to suffer most by the war and by the acts of the LTTE and the Security Forces in the North and East. All your battlefield related allegations are very interesting. The leaders of these religions in the North and East have seen it all. With people from all groups taking sanctuary within their walls when in need. These leaders have been forced to cling to whichever the leadership which is in control in their area for basic survival. Non-compliance would have serious implications. They can't walk out of their post of service into a different area when they feel like it. So your allegations (if they are true) completely ignore the circumstances under which they occured.

Maybe you can share more snippets with us regarding the insights you gained during experiences you had via your monitor, keyboard, mouse and perhaps your TV! :)

Sure the Catholic Church has had a bloody history. They were a powerful religion at one time with many world leaders at their beck and call. There corruption went hand in hand with the power they possessed at the time. Not so anymore. The Catholic Church like other religous bodies have come down to earth now and know that their business is to educate and strengthen the faith of their flock. While providing service where people are in need.

Your principle of condemning an entire community based on the actions and ideas of a few is ridiculous. It's like judging the Tamil people by the standards of the LTTE or the Buddhist people by the standards of the Hela Urumaya.

And once again you give us a link to an article where the journalist is busier giving his personal opinion and misinterpreting what the Church leaders said rather than reporting facts. The only thing where facts and views went even remotely close was regarding Kenneth Fernando's statement. The rest of it is a ridiculous diatribe criticising the church based on Mahindapala's views. Bishop De Chickera had very clearly stated faults of both the govt and the LTTE and the churches criticism where required. Is this wrong? Is criticising the govt wrong?

So you and Nims (if you aren't the same person) are very much racist and very very very ignorant.

Anonymous said...

LMAO Mahen, I seriously suggest you grab a dictionary and look up "racism" and "racist" in it. You have absolutely no fucking clue what they mean. You're one of those people that just bandy it about, even if it makes you sound like a complete and utter twat. Yet you have the temerity to call others ignorant.

Do let us all know about the "condemnation" the Church had for the brutal killings of Thiruchelvam, Kethesh Loganathan, Lakshman Kadirgamar and a whole host of other Tamil and Sinhalese personalities who were murdered by the LTTE. Do you think stark silence = condemnation? Yet look at the Church weeping for the death of man who led LTTE fighting formations and under whose orders not only Sri Lankan soldiers but hundreds of civilians would have died. This is the same Church where some priest went to the Vanni, met with Prabhkaran and then came down south to tell everyone that he was like Jesus and humane! LOL! The same Church whose priests get drunk on Kilinochichi wine.

The Catholic Church has provided the services of the church to the LTTE without batting an eyelid. They allow the LTTE to store arms and ammunition inside churches, Catholic priests attend LTTE rallies and carry Prabhakaran's placards and then wail and whine about the Army whilst allowing the LTTE to have their heavy guns in the Madhu Church grounds. The Catholic Church is in bed with terrorism in Sri Lanka and they need to be exposed.

You say "corruption went hand in hand with the power they possessed at the time. Not so anymore." Please! I guess abusing kids only happened in the past eh? Supporting terrorism also in the past only, and not today with the LTTE eh? Take a look at: http://www.priestsofdarkness.com/

Bishop De Chickera is another nutjob who keeps silent on the LTTE, but bitches and whines about the government. Mahindapala has done a good job in exposing the cretin. You just can't stand the fact that someone has exposed the rogues in frocks and that is why you call it "ridiculous."

If anyone's "very, very, very ignorant" it's folks like you who lick the boots of Christian priests and pretend that they and the Church are perfect. And also those who are completely unaware of what racism means, but just pop them in their writings to attack and try and silence others.

Open your eyes and see that the Catholic Church is in bed with the LTTE. Someone should write a book called "Christianity Betrayed?"

Anonymous said...

Very nice picture of Catholic priests:

http://i24.tinypic.com/2d98jq.jpg

This is how they "denounce" terrorism according to Mahen

Anonymous said...

Well clearly as you have little or no way of countering the arguments put forward you resort to repeating yourself and venting out your personal hate for the church.

Wat happened? Catholic girlfriend dumped you? Or u got left at the alter? :)

You'd be well advised to read the comments before deciding to reply to it... Or perhaps you read it but it didnt register in your small mind. Poor you...

I did mention Kenneth Fernando's inappropriate statement in my previous comment. Your exagerated version of it here is interesting.

Your reference to the child abuse case is of little relevance here. Clergy of other religions too have committed their own crimes. For example simply because a few members of the Bhuddist clergy carried out a political murder (which they did in the 50's) you can't judge the entire Bhuddist clergy or all Bhuddists in Sri Lanka by those standards. Can you?

Well if you read the article YOU gave in your comment you will notice how much De Chikera has condemned the LTTE. As I said earlier. Read! Don't glance through a few lines and intepret things through your biased, partisan eyes.

And since you're so conversant with the subject and love spewing out your hatred I think you can write the book - 'Christianity Betrayed'. Pass a copy my way if possible. I'm sure it'll make entertaining reading...

Anonymous said...

Hey Sittingnut,
Your revelation of Indi's Padashow identity has got to him.

Indi writes "you are actually celebrating the murder of a human being. that makes you an animal, just like tamilchelvan." So according to him TC is an animal? Then why does he say S/Nut is an animal because he is celebrating the murder of a human being?

Thamil Chelvan was a murderer and was planning further murders. He was killed during a military operation against the murderers. Both these facts make his death a cause of celebration. S/Nut has always stood up for tolerance and freedom. He unlike TC has not called for the killing of "other people who did not agree with him". He has called for the defeat of LTTE terrorism and protection of human rights. He has justified the use of military means for that cause. He has every right to celebrate military victories.

It takes the stupidity of Indi to find S/Nut and TC same.

ivap said...

Have to agree that SP was VP's/hardliners lapdog and never really came across as a "political" head who understood/communicated/acted with the political dimensions at play in the conflict.

This may have been a good strategic move probably aimed at getting a new political head who may be able to take a more political role but I doubt if it will bring about any change.

Anonymous said...

One less terrorist makes the earth a better place.

If the Church doesn't like it.. fuck them too. There is really no need to be concerned about the opinions of a group of people who have committed some of the human history's most grievious attrocitities in the name of an illusive diety. There's really very little difference between the LTTE and the Catholic church. The former is upfront about its crimes, while the latter hides behind a cloth and sanctimonious crap which no one believes anymore anyway.

Anonymous said...

"...S. Paramu Tamilchelvan who returned to Kilinochchi yesterday after his journey to European countries since 27 January, said:“There is no place again for Sinhala - communal parties in the Tamils’ homeland. Already those parties had been rejected by the Tamils.”“They won't be allowed again to set their foot in the Tamils’ land:” Paramu Tamilchelvan, Political Commissar of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, said with determination, after his arrival in Kilinochchi yesterday afternoon..."
More on this interview is available on http://www.asiantribune.com/oldsite/show_news.php?id=9262