Wednesday, January 16, 2008

terrorist pussies murder innocents yet again

terrorists murdered civilians including school children through a claymore mine yet again today. details here.

as i have said before this is not something new; this what ltte pussies do. they have done it at all times (warning: graphic photos) during ceasefire periods, during periods when government was not conducting military operations, and during periods of military operations.

will peaceniks and ltte parrots stupidly connect this with the unlamented ceasefire agreement(cfa)'s official end today? probably. see here for what they did after another recent bombing forgetting what went before. that was typical. i have no doubt they will repeat that performance today yet again. let us bloggers see which peacenik blog is first to blame everyone but the terrorist pussies for this murder.

all other sri lankans, with eyes to see reality and not beholden to terrorists, know what terrorists really are, and that this kind crime is to be expected from them at all times, cfa or no cfa .

existence of ltte terrorists are not compatible with principles of justice, freedom, human rights, or democracy. only peacenik criminals who have no regard these principles( in spite of their public lip service ) will advocate peace with these murderers.

even without moral reasons, peace with fascist ltte through appeasement will not succeed pragmatically. it will end in failure like all other such attempts at appeasement (with them and with other fascists all over the world throughout history)

all those who respect those principles mentioned above and are not in denial about reality, will support any effort to defeat terrorists including use of legitimate military force.



24 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well said. Bastards and their supporter in the south should be wiped out.

908 said...

This is what that cocksucking piece of shit "the Benevolent Dictator" supports and speaks up for!

tinker said...

sittingnut,

you have spoken for me too, like you have pointed out the NGO mafia will try to justyfy the LTTEs actions , even better than the LTTE itself.

its time we all get together and do our own crusade against the real enemies of peace in Sri Lanka.
lets do out own bit to fight the LTTE and its sponsers, including all the oversease tamils who foot the LTTEs war bill and the so called Colombo 3 based 'civil society' of Sri Lanka.

there can be no peace in Sri Lanka till there is LTTE and the 'civil society' mafia is there to make sure that the LTTE stays focused on use of violance as its meance of communication and also to ensure that successive SL Govts get check mated by the International Community at all times.

Anonymous said...

Well well the war has started and the South will bear the consequences of what it has created. Unless the country splits, there will be no end to the violence and deaths.

Anonymous said...

Nope, the Tamils will bear the consequences for walking away from the peace table. They will pay for the bus bombing. Just wait and see.

Mike Hunt said...

"The Tamils will bear the consequences" Damn straight. That horrible race, they should really be exterminated. Splittingnut? any solutions? I read a pretty good book once by some German guy, cant remember who it was. I think you might relate to him i think he too had an inferiority complex and a hatred of things/people that weren't exactly like him or the way he wanted them to be, a real patriot though. Great post though, something very fresh, the way you swap P's name with pussy is a real laugh! (they both start with P- GET IT!) You should think about working for CNN, they would really go for your style. ROCK ON DAWG!

sittingnut said...

anon at 1/16/2008 11:03 am:
terrorists should be wiped out if possible. and their supporters should be bought to justice
i have no doubt that this this will be done to great extent eventually

908:
i have no objection use of expletives but the best way to make ppl like "the benevolent dictator" expose his idiocy prejudices, and bigotry, is to use quote his own words and expose his prejudices in the relevant thread.
as i believe i did in previous thread.

tinker:
thanks for the comment :-)
as i have said before best way to fight the terrorist supporters and parrots in the south is to expose their activities, their own words and the principles that underlie them for what they are .
yes we can do our own small part in that
keep on doing that !

anon 1/17/2008 7:23 am :
as i have said before only way to get peace is to defeat terrorists. not tamils or north or east or south, just terrorists .
and it can be done as with all other criminals in spite of the terrorist parroting by peaceniks .
hysterical comments like yours wont change reality. so wake up, fool

anon 1/17/2008 8:19 am:
as i said ppl who equate tamils with terrorists are racists
it seems you are one, just like the terrorist pussies

mike hunt :
you are a typical peacenik trying to be ironic and failing like a fool.
it is obvious that you are unable to read because you attribute to me things i have never espoused .

may be you think that is the only way to,

oppose my support for democracy , justice , freedom and human rights .
oppose my exposure of peaceniks failing to do that and their parroting of terrorists , with facts taken from their own actions and words
show resentment at my calling the cowardly terrorist leader a "pussy "


well you fail here too

only thing you did was to expose your real sympathies

wake up to reality . fool :-)

The Benevolent Dictator said...

What 'idiocy prejudices' (your words, not mine) do I have Snut?

Let's see. We both agree LTTE are terrorists. We both agree LTTE should be wiped out militarily. We both agree that the govt, for all its incompetencies, is doing a fairly good job with the war.

We disagree on methodology, something that ViC and I debated too. What exactly are these 'prejudices'?

908 - very perceptive. Good boy. Now sit.

sittingnut said...

the benevolent dictator :
read before writing your absurd comments ( as i said to you last time )
see the previous thread (link) to find what i call your idiocy and prejudices.
why not answer the questions i put to to you there which you avoid answering. as i said there, you avoid them, because answering them will expose your muddleheadedness and prejudices.

if you answer they will also clarify what we agree on and disagree on, and why.

so don't run away or assume things without a basis , answer. :-)
-

btw to the already long list i will add another question.
what is the "methodology" on which you and i disagree on? what "methodology" do you think i support ? and on what basis are you saying that i support this or that "methodology"? you seem to prejudge a lot of things. so answer and explain this along with others so that we know what we agree or disagree on .

sittingnut said...

oops !
this is the correct link

Anonymous said...

More blood; that is what we need to see of others.

More death; that is what we want to hear about others.

More despair; that is what we dream for others.

This was a country once blessed by Lord Buddha; who chanted "Nahi Verena Verani".

We are more intellectually more apt than Lord Buddha.

The history will record who was right, whether it is Buddha or the Buddha Puthra.

bauddhaya said...

dear anonymous, please keep your sanctimonious preaching to yourself.

You would have shown Hitler bigtime, and you *so* would have saved all the Jews. Would love to see your preaching after someone has slit the throats of your mummy, daddy and family members.

Ravana said...

Sittingnut - The Benevolent Dictator's explanation is very clear. Just answer HIS question: what prejudices are you referring to?

As usual, when faced with the inconsistency and blatant inaccuracy of your own accusing statements, you are trying to avoid explaining yourself, because there is no reasonable explanation.

You use your usual tactic of asking questions instead of making a clear statement. This is lame, for two reasons. Firstly, because it is unclear whether these questions are rhetorical or not. If we assume they are rhetorical, naturally by definition, they deserve no reply. If they are not rhetorical, then this indicates that you seriously don't know what you are talking about, and seek to be educated. Is this the case?

Frankly, this is getting a bit old. You are just preaching to the converted.

The Benevolent Dictator said...

As usual you reply questions with questions (and rhetorical questions too) and then expect me to answer them! Cheeky bugger you are.

I will only answer your last question as that was obviously not a rhetorical one. What I meant by methodology was that whilst we both agree that LTTe has to be defeated for peace in SL, we disagree on the methods employed by the govt to achieve this, hence 'methodology'. I'm surprised you couldn't get that..

You, whilst occasionally making sounds about how Tamils shouldn't be equated with the LTTE, seem to such a gullible enough to believe that this govt will defeat the LTTE and then address Tamil grievances..grievances revolving around land, language, jobs etc. While some of these grievances have been addressed, not by any govt but by the evolution of society, the credibility of the govt in the Tamil's peoples eyes is nil and so confidence building measures such as sticking to past promises such as those agreed to in the Indo-Lanka Accord etc must be seen to be implemented (it is irrelevant whether it was forced upon the govt by the Indians; the govt at the time agreed and then reneged on the promise to implement it).

I'm sorry, but I am not that naive. In addition to my distrust of the govt, there is another reason for my wanting the govt to start implementing a political solution parallel to its efforts to militarily defeat the LTTE. The LTTE is entrenched in the N and E and inspite of its barbaric ways putting off many Tamils, when confronted with a choice between the known and the unknown devils it is human nature to choose the known devil. Showing a sincerety to a political solution and preventing the likes of EPDP and TMVP from terrorising the Tamils would go a long way towards winning the 'hearts and minds' of the Tamils. Whilst this may not of interest to you, the next bit would; without the support of the people of the land, this conflict will not end in the near future. There are many examples of this, a good one being the ongoing insurgency in Irag where the few successes the US Army has had have been in places where they have the support of the local populace.

Now whilst we both want the LTTE to be defeated we have different ideas about how to get it done. I have many friends who concur with you and we have many debates but we keep it civil. The problem with you, and I keep saying this, is that you are so narrow minded that you are willing to attack anyone who differs even so slightly from your opinions.

To each his own I suppose. I won't be commenting on this blog anymore, not because I'm running away, but because I have limited time to devote to this and would rather not spend it banging my head against the proverbial wall. So good luck and good health to you.

Anonymous said...

Lord Buddha was a "paraya" fellow. He wanted us to protect his Teachings; But gave a blunt tool known as "Maithree" to protect it. What a nut. Down with Buddha! You, Buddha, the idiot, tell us whether you would have had compassion if any one did cut your mummy's throat. Shame on you!

Sam said...

Dear Ravana,

What the fuck are you doing here showing off your ugly face? Please and get raped by that Christian priest that you gush about on your blog. I see you've been attacking the Maldivians lately and they have collectively pissed on your face. What fun. It's not only the Sri Lankan blogosphere that has recognised your retarded nature, but the Maldivians as well. Congratulations, it's only January and you're the toss pot of the year.

sittingnut said...

anon at 1/18/2008 10:42 am:
if you want to live in fantasy world that is your choice.
rest of us live in reality

bauddhaya:
thanks for the comment

sittingnut said...

ravana
i see that you are as clueless as ever
this is what i wrote when asked about the benevolent dictator's prejudices, "see the previous thread (link) to find what i call your idiocy and prejudices." ( btw i also asked 908 above to deal with tbd in the relevant thread as well)

so are you clueless as to not see the link in my above comment ? ( here is the link again in case you still cannot find it )
if you follow the link ( you can do that by clicking on it. just ask someone for instructions if you don't know how to follow a hyperlink :-) ), then you will see what i mean by the benevolent dictator's prejudices which were on disply in the previous thred .
if you think i have not pointed out his prejudices there, let me know there :-)

-
you say
"As usual, when faced with the inconsistency and blatant inaccuracy of your own accusing statements, you are trying to avoid explaining yourself, because there is no reasonable explanation."

what is the "inconsistency and blatant inaccuracy" that you are referring to? in spite of you accusing me of not giving an explanations, it is in fact you who fail to explain that.
just saying i am inconsistent and inaccurate will not do. quote me being inconsistent and inaccurate . in this blog you have to give reasons, as i did by referring to relevant thread when asked about his prejudices.
asking you to explain yourself is not rhetorical btw. it is just asking you to explain yourself if you have clue about what you are writing about :-)

and when you don't give reasons i will keep asking you to, no matter how much you dislike questions . :-)

--
you say
"You use your usual tactic of asking questions instead of making a clear statement. This is lame, for two reasons. Firstly, because it is unclear whether these questions are rhetorical or not. If we assume they are rhetorical, naturally by definition, they deserve no reply. If they are not rhetorical, then this indicates that you seriously don't know what you are talking about, and seek to be educated. Is this the case?"

that just shows your limited intelligence.
first i am always clear on where i stand, if you have questions on any of my positions, ask me . i welcome questions unlike you .
when i ask questions, i am asking the person to explain and define his/her stand clearly.


and that is what i did with tbd as relevant questions clearly indicate (my stand if required is given in those questions and on the posts and comments )

to take an example, relevant to this thread -

when the benevolent dictator said
"We both agree that the govt, for all its incompetencies, is doing a fairly good job with the war.We disagree on methodology, something that ViC and I debated too."
i asked,
"what is the "methodology" on which you and i disagree on? what "methodology" do you think i support ? and on what basis are you saying that i support this or that "methodology"?"
precisely bc it is not clear what methodology he is supporting and think i support .

his statement indicate that he has assumed and prejudged the "methodology" i support, and and then carried that assumption and prejudice further by saying he and i disagree.
if we are to make any sense of his statement or to have any coherent discussion he should say what "methodology" he supports and what he thinks i support ( based on my writing). he has not done that anywhere.
that is why i ask that question ( same with other questions in previous thread. )

do you get that now , boy :-)
--
as you can see your comment was irrelevant and clueless as usual

sittingnut said...

the benevolent dictator
you are still running away like the silly bigoted coward you are .

As usual you reply questions with questions (and rhetorical questions too)
no :-) you again have not read.
my question to you in my previous reply to you has nothing to do with your question, but referred to another statement in your comment - see below ( why do you lie about things that can be so easily corrected ?- you only prove your own stupidity ) .

in fact i answered your question about prejudices by referring you (and 908) to the previous thread (here is the link again ) where they are explained. ( and then asked you to finish some unfinished business in that thread by answering some questions i raised there asking you to clarify your statements to indicate that they are not based solely on prejudices without basis , and from which you had ran away , true to form, )

you statement about not answering rhetorical questions is yet anther skimpy excuse to get away from the fact that you have no basis whatever to some of the statements you made in previous thread. ( beyond your idiotic prejudices )

as i said there you are free to run away like a coward and not answer, if you cannot explain the basis for your idiotic prejudices. however by running way and not answering we now have solid grounds on which to accuse you of running away and of spouting idiotic prejudices without any basis.

-

as i said the question i raised here had nothing to do with your question.

it is about your incoherent statement ;
"We both agree that the govt, for all its incompetencies, is doing a fairly good job with the war.We disagree on methodology, something that ViC and I debated too."
in reply to that statement ( not to any question by you ) i asked
"what is the "methodology" on which you and i disagree on? what "methodology" do you think i support ? and on what basis are you saying that i support this or that "methodology"?"
precisely bc it is not clear what methodology you are supporting and what you think i support .
your statement indicate that you have assumed and prejudged the "methodology" i support, and and then carried that assumption and prejudice further by saying you and i disagree.
if we are to to make any sense of your statement or to have any coherent discussion you should say what "methodology" you supports and what you think i support ( based on my writing). you have not done that anywhere.

now you again repeat that incoherent statement
What I meant by methodology was that whilst we both agree that LTTe has to be defeated for peace in SL, we disagree on the methods employed by the govt to achieve this, hence 'methodology'.I'm surprised you couldn't get that..... Now whilst we both want the LTTE to be defeated we have different ideas about how to get it done.
again what "methodology" and "ideas" are you referring to? I am not asking the meaning of word "methodology" but what do you mean by methods government use and about which according to you we disagree on?give details. in spite of your lengthy comment you are not at all clear on that.
what is the methodology i support , according to you , and what is the methodology you support ? and what are the differences?
first learn to write what you believe clearly. unfortunately you seem totally incapable of doing that


anyway you are still making assumption about my position on the issues without any basis whatsoever .
when you say i support this or that, quote me
otherwise you are merely expressing your idiotic prejudices

among other things you say "[you are] gullible enough to believe that this govt will defeat the LTTE and then address Tamil grievances."
again it is you who is connecting two different things due to your prejudice . don't connect ltte with tamil grievances if you are unable to explain the connection. which you fail to do here as in previous thread in spite of repeated requests to do so . that ltte criminals use tamil grievances as a excuse for their atrocities does not mean they are connected . question is why you believe that propaganda unquestioningly .

You, whilst occasionally making sounds about how Tamils shouldn't be equated with the LTTE,
occasionally ? i have continued to make the statement that only racist equate tamils with racists in most of my political posts and comments. that is why i have long said that peacenisk are racists no different from ltte or some sinhala racists

are you saying that ltte cannot be defeated, since you say to believe that is gullible ? you as always is not clear. may be you are confusing defeat with elimination.
ltte can be deprived of direct control over people and territory. if you read ( which you have not done as usual ) that is what i mean by defeat of ltte . i have always maintained that probably ltte cannot be eliminated . there will always be small groups in hiding planting bombs . i have been clear on that when i define victory over ltte ( see here for one among large number of posts and comments where i mentioned that .) there will alway be murderers..

you like all fools make a false analogy with iraq war. sl military is well versed in fighting ltte effectively it is you who fail to notice what is happening and assume and prejudge that fighting ltte is alienating most of the local population.

for one have you noticed how quiet jaffna is? hardly any attacks against army inside there since middle of 2006 ( in comparison to from december 2005 when ltte stated attacking military openly, to middle of 2006, during which time there was attacks almost weekly ) why is that? if you are intelligent you will see that sri lanka army is quite capable of deploying counter insurgency tactics with support of local population quite effectively.
that fact more than aynthing is why i believe sl military is capable of defeating ltte. you on the other hand is lost because you assume and prejudge without recognizing reality

did i say anything against "winning hearts and minds"of tamils? where ? in fact i have not done so. you are assuming things about me to cover your silly prejudice about my position here.

your confused remarks about political solution show your limited grasp on the subject and principles involved .
as i have said numerous times (here for one of many instances ) political grievances of tamils in north and east provinces can be addressed only through democratic means. all solutions proposed by anybody ( gosl . india, whatever ) do not have any point ( except as propaganda, among other things to win hearts and minds ) until there is a democratic tamil leadership to bargain with other interest groups in sri lanka and arrive at a compromise solution . meanwhile ltte has to be defeated. so what do you disagree about this ?

as i said you assume and prejudge like an idiot
-
i certainly treat ppl like you who cannot make coherent arguments and instead depend on assumptions and prejudices with contempt they deserve.

I won't be commenting on this blog anymore, not because I'm running away, but because I have limited time to devote to this and would rather not spend it banging my head against the proverbial wall.
(if you don't have time take your time but...)
you are in fact running away like all cowardly bigots with idiotic prejudices when asked to explain their positions in coherent language.
and yes you will be asked to explain the basis of your positions here. only idiots or/and bigots will find that a difficult wall to get over.
:-D

sittingnut said...

anon 1/21/2008 1:24 pm:
whatever problems you have with lord buddha ( or your own brian ) you can deal with elsewhere in a relevant place.
--


sam:
i am not sure whether you are the sam who sometimes comments here

however ravana is a clueless idiot i agree on that :-)

Anonymous said...

Dear Sittingnut

Buddhism came to Sri Lanka as part of Indian Imperialist Agenda. The cultural invasion by Arahath Mahinda was meant to remove our teeth. The weapon "Maithriya" was used to take out our teeth. That is why we have not been able to fight with LTTE. Always people come with "Nahi Verena Verani" even when the LTTE put knives at their own mothers.

If we want to win the war with LTTE we have to expose the futility of carrying on with this bloody useless religion that was enforced on us by the Indian Imperialists 2500 years back.

Like NGOs and imperialists the religion always remind us about compassion; which we should not extended to LTTE and their lot.

I am in your side sittingnut. But you don't understand the subtle subversion done by the religion; Buddhism.

We need to expose all overt and covert forces that prevent us fighting our enemy. Hope now you understand.

sittingnut said...

anon 1/22/2008 12:25 pm :
your mental disturbance seems to have misled you abut my positions.

your incoherent statements about imperialism ( did i ever mention imperialism? no ) , your belief that that ngo are preaching compassion ( when what i have said was that peacenik ngos are mere paid servants parroting murderous terrorists and ignoring and justifying terror, including in the name of peace at the cost of democracy , freedom , human rights, justice) , your conspiracy theory mentality ( very like peacenik's conspiracy mentality ), etc. all indicate that you are either suffering from some sort of mental disease or that you are purposely putting on an act ( which means you are even more crazy) .

if you want to make a point here you should be able to use reason, and to write coherently. you should also base your arguments on pragmatism , democracy , freedom , human rights, justice, and above all facts. (instead of depending on conspiracy theories and silly talk about imperialism etc. ) it is clear you are patently incapable of any of that

so as i said before you should go state your problems ( with buddhism and your own brain) in a appropriate place. this is not it . :-)

Anonymous said...

Dear Sittingnut

If you are not a real nut this would be enlightening to note.

Lord Buddha was the first peacenik who came to Sri Lanka to negotiate peace between "Naga" and "Yaksha".

He is the first International Figure that interfered in our internal affairs.

His Sasana was among the first NGOs established with a view of undermining the national state at that time.

His preaching left communities unarmed and exposed to enemies.

For these reasons the country in which he was born did not want to follow him. Like foold we followed and his preaching prevent us waging a war against the tigers.

He taught us to have compassion on people who come after us to kill us by expressing compassion on the tiger like character "Anguli Mala". As disciples we have to follow him or betray him.

All these unwanted things can be thrown to the dustbin of the history.

Meet the enemy with the philosophy of eye to eye, life to life; not Nahi verena.

If you cannot understand this logic you are not only a sittingnut but a living nut.

sittingnut said...

anon at 1/25/2008 9:35 pm:

did you forget to take the medication again . now run along and take it. and get a life. :-D
--
this is too much for your limited intelligence but may be when you are in a saner state someone might explain this to you

peacenik ngos are not preaching compassion or peace, as buddhism and all major religions purport to. in fact peacenik ngos are merely paid servants of terrorists murderers parroting appeasement of convicted criminals, thus allowing ltte terrorists to oppress sri lankans (esp tamils) and deny them human rights, justice, freedom and democracy.

military is nor fighting terrorist as revenge ( or eye for an eye or life for an life as you idiotically put it , giving away your peacenik sympathies ) but to bring justice , human rights, freedom and democracy to all sri lankans .


that is why all moral person support the fight against terrorist pussies . and only racist peaceniks oppose it

it is clear that you are unable to understand these simple facts ( let alone use logic)

so untill you understand reality and can use basic logic go take your medicine and sleep ( i am sure sanjana will know a good doctor , one he so frequently consults )

:-)