Monday, February 09, 2009

ltte terrorist homicide bomber kills refugees

a so called suicide bomber of ltte killed people escaping from terrorist control today.

expect more such attacks
against "soft" targets from the terrorist pussies.
but don't expect people who mourned the dirty politician lasantha wickramatunga so extravagantly, to mourn about this (beyond token tears). or even to care much about the event or what it reveals (once again) about tiger terrorists. even their token condemnations will be used as a tool to call for 'peace' with terrorists and to create a disgusting moral equalization between sl military and terrorists.

these peacenik criminals and their corrupt fellow travelers still continue to call for ceasefires. they will continue to oppose use of military violence against ltte ( under the excuse of protecting civilians).

when will they ever understand that ltte does not care for tamils and is only using them as human shields both literally and in propaganda? when will they understand that civilians will never be safe as long as they are under the ltte, ceasefire or no ceasefire, safe zone or no safe zone? that anyone under ltte will be used either as a shield or a weapon?

in fact these peaceniks (except for few idiots, in literal sense) already understand that well enough. they just ignore it and parrot the terrorist propaganda by deliberate choice.
why? because you have to be throughly rotten inside and out to be a peacenik. hypocrisy is the least of their crimes

that is why they, their statements, and their actions, should be exposed to daylight now and as long as they live. these people are no better than nazi collaborators. and should suffer the same fate imo

by peaceniks i mean people who think peace is worth any cost (even cost of human rights, justice, democracy, and freedom ). that is people like paikiasothy saravanamuttu, jehan perera, jayadeva uyangoda, sunila abeysekera, sunanda deshapriya, nimalka fernando, rohan edirisinha, jeevan thiagarajaha, and their ilk (and their underlings like sanjana hattotuwa). and their fellow travelers in the sl blogosphere like hypocrite indi.ca/padashow.wordpress (son and tool of a corrupt political appointee) and his cronies.



ps
busy. i will back to 'normal' blogging routine soon

44 comments:

SL1st said...

Right you are.

sittingnut said...

sl1st:
thanks for letting me know about the error through email. i must have deleted several lines while editing earlier. corrected it.

Anonymous said...

Homicide bomber?

ravana said...

Get your facts right next time.

http://www.indi.ca/2009/02/the-nihilism-of-the-ltte/

Anonymous said...

Refugees? In your own country?

Maybe the only accurate depiction by you about how Tamils are treaded in your country.

sittingnut said...

anon at 2/09/2009 5:19 pm
i think that is the more appropriate term to describe these murderers. "suicide bomber" like "martyrs" carry a hint about self sacrifice . but i am not rigid on this

ravana :
my facts are correct .
that a corrupt blogger ( one who i did not call a peacenik but a fellow traveler) changed his mind today does not alter anything.

indi.padashow is as i said many times a tool of his father, and is doing exactly what i once predicted in his own blog ( in indi.ca, not padashow.wordpress, before he started censoring any criticism that bites him there.) siding with the winner after the fact. as i further said then expect his father to creep up to powers that be soon enough. (you are free to find my comment there. i will do so when i have the time, there or in my saved copy if he decides to delete it now as sanjana did with entire moju blog to cover his actions ).

but before it was clear that sl military is going to win, indi. padashow did "continue to call for ceasefires" and "continue to oppose use of military violence against ltte" in token posts after other terrorist atrocities. do you deny that ?

you see boy, i always have the fact on my side :-)

anon 2/09/2009 8:45 pm:
these ppl are refugees( or as the "correct" term is "internally displaced persons" ) not due to how they were treated but due to violence, and were returning to government control areas after escaping terrorists . ppl everywhere do take refuge to avoid traumatic events.
if you have a brain use it, before mindlessly repeating silly terrorist propaganda. if not you are free to be an idiot too . :-)

ravana said...

I seem to recall you changing your mind too Sittingnut.


These are your words in November 2005, referring to Mahinda as buffalo, a practice which I notice you were addicted to then, which you strangely seem to have stopped now (is it the change of mind, or your cowardice I wonder):

"buffalo won’t deliver a thing, like cbk he will stay there doing nothing . even the war will be restarted by ltte. but unlike in 1994 the government is broke. so he wll break earlier than cbk.

sooner he lose the parliment and become lame the better for sri lanka. i would give him 1.5 yrs at most."

Yeah, how wrong you were buddy boy, how wrong you were.

By the way, you sit here and attack Indi under the cover of anonymity. You accuse him of all sorts of things, including deleting your comments. How hollow your accusations sounds when it is obvious to everyone that he could just take you off Kottu and dry up your readership in a flash if he wanted to. But he doesn't, because he sticks to his principles of allowing opinion.

You accuse him of all sorts of things, but what have you done that is so great? What have you done to improve things in this country? All you can do is sit here in your obscurity and anonymity and rant to the blind and deaf on positions that they already agree on, because that is the position that is advertised on a mass scale.

Now I love the 'buffalo' said...

Now Ravana let the sitting nut be a patriot ok. Don't bring in the past, it must be bitter.

Expect sitting nuts posts to end with ravana + peacenik from now on.

sittingnut said...

ravana :
if you cannot read, i cannot help you

I seem to recall you changing your mind too Sittingnut.
did i say i did not? everyone does
questions that matter, in such a case, is, about what, when, and why, do one change his or her mind? does one change ones core principles?
you will see from what i say below that there is quite a contrast between when, and why, and for what, i changed my mind, without changing my principles and indi.padashow's actions.
in your hurry to defend your master you, like all foolish slaves, lost your rationality and basically lost the argument at first sentence
.
now for details :-)
-

in November 2005, referring to Mahinda as buffalo, a practice which I notice you were addicted to then, which you strangely seem to have stopped now
your ignorance is showing.
i fact i continue to do so . check for example the comment section of my recent post . posted on 1/22/2009and in some of my recent comments in other blogs .

do you admit you have got your fact wrong again, boy ? or would you run away like the cur you are to your corrupt master indi ?lol@the fool ravanna

-
i did criticized mahinda buffalo before and after the election in 2005 and continue to do so. nor do i disclaim that i did not support him for president . where did i say that i did? you are confusing two different things.

but there is a difference between me and your master indi.padashow ,
i expressed my support for defeating of ltte using violence before any major military operation, before any "victory" . my arguments against peace with ltte can be found throughout the blog. for example in the post i linked with word "peaceniks" in the main post which was written on june 01, 2006 (though it is not the first one where i made it ). if you read posts for 2006 there are posts making clear where i stood
given the available choices, i did choose the government's actions to defeat the ltte again before any major military operation, before any "victory". and made clear why i did so then
in contrast indi.padashow on whose defense you are making these silly arguments is only doing now after the ltte is defeated. he in contrast to me, 'did "continue to call for ceasefires" and "continue to oppose use of military violence against ltte" in token posts after other terrorist atrocities.

do you deny that ?'

why didn't you answer that question posed before?
are you so much of an ass licker as to deny even that fact ? boy ?
lol@ravana the indi's slave

-
By the way, you sit here and attack Indi under the cover of anonymity.
in the first place i always post as sittingnut and link to this blog as you hopefully do with ravana. in contrast to indi.ca who post under different names and as padashow.
my real name has always been available to anyone who asked for it on a reciprocal basis as i have indicated several times in this blog. and i have included it several times in emails to indi without any request from him in correspondence about kottu or his blogs. in any case it is easy to find without asking. i have also many times explained why i do not use it as my blogging name (any more than you do yours btw.) (check this and check the comments too )

-
You accuse him of all sorts of things, including deleting your comments.
i don't think he will deny that he does not publish my comments in his blogs now (as he has a perfect right to do so btw as i have said before. i am just stating the fact) .yet again, i have to ask you to check you facts first.
and unlike some i do not post comments under different names.

How hollow your accusations sounds when it is obvious to everyone that he could just take you off Kottu and dry up your readership in a flash if he wanted to. But he doesn't, because he sticks to his principles of allowing opinion.
lol
as they say idiocy has no cure. and you are idiot.
yes he has a perfect right to take me out of kottu at his whim. it is his private property .
while i appreciate kottu as a service, question is whether he is keeping me to "stick to his principles of allowing opinion" as you say (and as i once thought)? after all bores like you who live to be bored, may enjoy a "peaceful" cocooned disinfected kottu purged of likes of me, but would everyone? wasn't there another sl blog aggregator that did exactly that some time ago? such actions , you know, cut both ways if you know what i mean.

as for traffic, as i explained long time ago kottu ceased being the main avenue for traffic to this blog long time ago. traffic from kottu to here is even less than what i indicated then . as i said then traffic to kottu has long plateaued while internet use in sl has skyrocketed.

==
about "now i love the 'buffalo'" :
it is clear that this person is bitter and angry at me for some reason and enjoyed and is encouraging attacks on me. wonder when i kicked him so much that he had to resort to not linking to his blog . (i have an idea who this is, check my recent posts and comments sections and guess. :-) )

anyway i for one do not love the buffalo .
nor do i use patriotism as an argument for defeating terrorists. and i use word 'peacenik' to describe people who think peace is worth any cost (even cost of human rights, justice, democracy, and freedom ).
obviously this person is so biter against me he has lost his mind and cannot read and check facts.

ravana said...

Would you mind retyping that with some punctuation and perhaps some capital letters? It is rather diffilcult to read, and gives the impression of a man getting so worked up, his voice getting higher and higher, louder and louder until only bats and dogs can hear him.

Congratulations. I think you convinced your target market.

sittingnut said...

when you have lost the argument substantively and has nothing left to say, you resort to stylistic criticism to save face.
sorry i don't pander to idiots and indi padashow's slaves like you .
and yes i don't expect to convince such ppl . i just make them look stupid by exposing their errors in facts and irrationality of their arguments . so that they resort to what you just did. they are soooo predictable
lol@ravana

Serendib_Isle said...

So true, sittingnut. Good post.

By the way, you are one of the few SL bloggers with a backbone who have the guts to take criticism on one’s own blog – well done mate, keep it up!

Liberal Lanka said...

It is a interesting story, you not been suranga Rajapakshe and you and him sharing a common first name. But it doesn't change the fact that you attack some one whose identity is very visible using your anonymity. Posting under a pseudo name and linking to an anonymous blog doesn't tell anything about your identity. If I am not mistaken that is what Ravana meant. :)

sittingnut said...

another moronic slave of indi/padashow with irrational arguments makes appearance
tell me, why shouldn't i disclose relevant facts ( which are public anyway ) about a blogger and his motivation for doing certain actions?
why should i stay silent when a blogger act hypocritically, despicably , and slander others, including sl military?


whether or not i am using a pseudo name is irrelevant to all that .

in addtion -
i am not anonymous.
you have either not read or understood the whole thing and so is barking up the wrong tree
my full real name is easily obtainable
( from me on reciprocal basis through email , and you can find it without much effort without my help as well ) and many blogger ( including indi padashow) know it. in fact people have used it to attack me (including in indi.ca blog ) you can find the comments there still.

in contrast it is ndi.ca who is denying that he is using the pseudo name padashow.

-
so mr liberal lanka crawl back in to your dog house and learn how to read , understand, and formulate rational arguments before making you appearance here again .unless you fancy yourself a joker and want to act the fool. and make comments like above . .

i will continue to expose corruption and hypocrisy no matter how many cronies of corruption attack me here

Liberal Lanka said...

wow, do you always respond to comments this way?

//another moronic slave of indi/padashow with irrational arguments makes appearance//

What makes me a slave of indi?I was just trying to point out what ravana had said to which you took an irrelevant story about you not been somebody. fool.

//why should i stay silent when a blogger act hypocritically, despicably , and slander others, including sl military?//

Did I say you to remain silent? fool, twice.

//my full real name is easily obtainable ( from me on reciprocal basis through email , and you can find it without much effort without my help as well ) and many blogger ( including indi padashow) know it.//

Asking for your real name from you or indi or anyone else doesn't make the fact that your blog is anonymous. fool, thrice.

//i will continue to expose corruption and hypocrisy no matter how many cronies of corruption attack me here//

Did I attack you? I just pointed out something, does that qualify as a attack to you. Arrogant fools like you are the complete fools. Yes keep exposing corruption and hypocrisy, that is the only reason your blog is still on my blogroll even though you often write conservative like crap.

sittingnut said...

yes i do respond to fools and slaves of indi padashow that way . you are one
mere assertions by you, that you are not a slave of indi padashow or a fool (while using irrational arguments to defend him and ravana. see above ), or asserting i am anonymous (when i am clearly not bc my name is easily available), or continuing to insult me, does not ( in fact it reinforces) the fact that you are a moronic slave of indi padashow and does deserve to be treated with any respect.
as i said
so mr liberal lanka crawl back in to your dog house and learn how to read , understand, and formulate rational arguments before making you appearance here again .unless you fancy yourself a joker and want to act the fool. and make comments like above . .
you are welcome to act the fool again ( and do not forget keep count of word 'fool' then we know that at least you can count):-)

Anonymous said...

Sittingnut:

when will they ever understand that ltte does not care for tamils

Well thats obivous, these people shedding tears for Tamil civilians don't care for them either.

They are on the same wavelength as the LTTE. Their interests are mutual.

For the NGOs they need cash for cash they need to release "solutions" and "reports" on war - not war no press releases no cash.

For the West they need a client state in the ready if/when India becomes to powerful and starts thinking independently (i.e. becomes a threat to them after they armed it into "super power" status to counter China).

For the LTTE and the die-ass-pora well its a matter of surivial. LTTE want die-ass-pora cash and remain King of Tamils, die-ass-pora want new passports plus the good feeling of boasting about "we too have a superior country which is ethnically pure". (I remember reading these morons talking with glee about the super state they had made -and we all know what a lie that is).

Liberal Lanka said...

prove how I am a slave of indi if you can or shut your big mouth.

I will not attack you, unless of course you attack me first using your filth. But I will shout out when you write conservative crap, corrupting the idea of libertarianism on the process.

//so mr liberal lanka crawl back in to your dog house and learn how to read , understand, and formulate rational arguments before making you appearance here again .unless you fancy yourself a joker and want to act the fool.//

You don't have to wet your pants like this, just be sensible.

sittingnut said...

anon at 2/15/2009 7:42 pm
thanks for the comment


liberal lanka:
anyone who defends a corrupt hypocritical indi.padahow with irrational moronic arguments and try to protect him and ilk from being exposed for what they are by attacking me, is by definition a slave of indi.
( btw your claim that you did not attack me laughable, see above, and i do treat slaves like you with open contempt as they deserve )

may be you prefer 'lapdog' to 'slave' perhaps? i am open to calling you a 'cur'. let me know
lol@liberal lanka the slave of indi.
-
you total inability to engage in rational debate is again made clear by your tangent offtopic allegation concerning my libertarianism.
but i will answer the fool

as i have asked many times before from you, quote one sentence by me that is against libertarianism ? you always run away like a filthy dog from a stone when asked to quote . and then you make the same silly claim in another thread (again without any quotation as here )regardless of the topic.
will the filthy cur liberal lanka run away again ? we will see?

Liberal Lanka said...

Usual stuff you are famous for, nothing rational just the filth.

//anyone who defends a corrupt hypocritical indi.padahow with irrational moronic arguments and try to protect him and ilk from being exposed//

show me where I defended indi. I pointed out something ravana had said, I didn't expect you to be the type who would bark at a friendly suggestion. Here goes the counting, fool.

//btw your claim that you did not attack me laughable, see above,//

As I said and did, I didn't attack you until you used your filth on me. Can't you understand something as simple as that, twice.

//as i have asked many times before from you, quote one sentence by me that is against libertarianism ?//

I said I will shout when you write your palin like conservative crap. fool for the third time, read my comment slowly.

sittingnut said...

filthy cur of indi.padashow is back. no surprise there ppl like him have no honor left after all the ass licking they do
-
liberal lanka the slave :

friendly suggestion my foot. you were defending ravana's irrational defending of indi with more idiocy . so you were defending indi .

anything i said about you is well deserved and justified. do you dare deny that?

now the dog says
I said I will shout when you write your palin like conservative crap. fool for the third time, read my comment slowly.
what the dog said earlier
But I will shout out when you write conservative crap, corrupting the idea of libertarianism on the process.

filthy dog liberal lanka again cannot quote one sentence from me that is agaist libertarianism as requested repeatedly here and in previous threads. but continues to make this off topic argument to cover up the obvious fact that he is defending corrupt indi padshow and his cronies with idiotic arguments. and he still claims he is not defending indi. lol @ the moronic slave liberal lanka
-
i will continue to openly show the utter contempt you well and truly deserves.
admit to what you are, fool ; you are a born slave with low iq without any ability to make a rational argument

prove me right again by making another slavish moronic comment here. ;lol

Liberal Lanka said...

I can't repeat this, prove one incident where I acted the slave of indi or shut your big mouth.

//now the dog says
I said I will shout when you write your palin like conservative crap. fool for the third time, read my comment slowly.
what the dog said earlier
But I will shout out when you write conservative crap, corrupting the idea of libertarianism on the process. //

yes asshole the words are different but they mean the same thing, when you write your palin like conservative crap corrupting libertarianism ideals on the process i will shout out. Take the whole day to read my comments and reply tomorrow.

//prove me right again by making another slavish moronic comment here. ;lol//

No need to cry like this, just prove or shut you big mouth.

sittingnut said...

i have already proven in detail that you are a slave of indi, read above .

to summarize when you use irrational and counter factual arguments ( eg "it doesn't change the fact that you attack some one whose identity is very visible using your anonymity",- which i already refuted above in details at 2/13/2009 10:37 pm) to attack me and try to defend exposure corruption of indi padshow you are acting like his idiot slave.
if you are not a slave why are you using and continue to defend such moronic arguments?
may be you have nothing better to do and want to devote your time to his defense ? lol. that is slavery, you fool.

-
words are different but they mean the same thing
no they don't

where have i written "conservative crap corrupting libertarianism ideals" ? if i have written such why can't you quote even one sentence?
i have asked this cur several times here and in other threads , so far he has not been able to quote even just one measly statement to back his claim of my writing ( note the "writing") "conservative crap corrupting libertarianism ideals".

if written, quote!
lol

why does this filthy cur persist with this off topic even after he has clearly lost the argument ? bc he believes it will distract from his slavish irrational defense of corrupt indi padashow above .

-

dog, don't forget to come again for an ass kicking. it is fun to spank an idiot to death and there are not many eager volunteers like you . lol

Liberal Lanka said...

More whining, cryings and shit load of filth. Filth must be genetically hard coded in you.

I never defended indi, defending would be to counter your allegations of indi, show me where i did defending or shut you filth hole.

Read this slowly asshole, your blog is an anonymous one, asking for your name by email doesn't qualify it as otherwise. trying to get that to your bird sized brain is not defending indi.

// bc he believes it will distract from his slavish irrational defense of corrupt indi padashow above . //

have you got amnesia? I told you to keep exposing corruption, see above comments.

Now get this somehow inside your brain you slow ass, when you write a palin like conservative crap i will point it out.

sittingnut said...

I never defended indi, defending would be to counter your allegations of indi, show me where i did defending or shut you filth hole....I told you to keep exposing corruption, see above comments.

lol the contradictory irrational idiocy of this sort of comment is obvious to anyone but this cur .
oh well, let us try to explain one more time .
you just tried( and still try , even after you have lost the argument long way back ) to attack my right and legitimacy to expose him ( see my previous comments). that amounts to defending him
you were irrational and idiotic while doing so (and in denying that you did.)
you are acting like a slave willing to go through any humiliation to defend his master . you cannot run from your own comments, and they clearly exemplify your slavish nature


that is logic .
may be you your brain cannot crunch that.
that is why you deserved to be called are a moron lol

-
your blog is an anonymous one, asking for your name by email doesn't qualify it as otherwise....
lol slave makes slavish argument again immediately after denying he is a slave.

as i said before ( and this cur obviously didnot read this ) ,
"whether or not i am using a pseudo name is irrelevant to all that[arguments i am making and facts i expose] .

in addtion -
i am not anonymous.
you have either not read or understood the whole thing and so is barking up the wrong tree
my full real name is easily obtainable ( from me on reciprocal basis through email , and you can find it without much effort without my help as well ) and many blogger ( including indi padashow) know it. in fact people have used it to attack me (including in indi.ca blog ) you can find the comments there still.

in contrast it is indi.ca who is denying that he is using the pseudo name padashow."

-

may be this filthy cur liberal lanka is urging me to be slow, so that he can keep up with me and others. you know some brains cannot work fast .
at least the fool hopefully has caught up with what was obvious to everyone else long time back; his loss on false " libertarian" argument .

when will he likewise accept that he was acting like a idiot slave of indi padashow .

hey idiot!, when will you run away ? or do you want more spanking ? lol

Liberal Lanka said...

since you seem to have amnesia plus cannot grasp more than one para at a time and trying to keep up with the pace i will try to explain this in one sentence. Keep attacking anyone if you like, but your blog is an anonymous one.

I have seen many people trying to inject into your pigeon brain that you are the local palin of conservative politics. Amnesiac, go through your posts and see their opinions, when I see you do the next palin I will point it out. Sorry if this is too long for you, this is the shortest i could do it.

sittingnut said...

indi's faithful lapdog returns for another public spanking. some ppl have no shame.

Keep attacking anyone if you like, but your blog is an anonymous one."
as expected idiocy of of the indi's slave continues. he repeats a silly argument already refuted before.

as i said before,
"whether or not i am using a pseudo name is irrelevant to all that[arguments i am making and facts i expose] .

in addition -
i am not anonymous.
you have either not read or understood the whole thing and so is barking up the wrong tree
my full real name is easily obtainable ( from me on reciprocal basis through email , and you can find it without much effort without my help as well ) and many blogger ( including indi padashow) know it. in fact people have used it to attack me (including in indi.ca blog ) you can find the comments there still.

in contrast it is indi.ca who is denying that he is using the pseudo name padashow."

by calling me (counter factually) an anonymous you make a irrational and idiotic attempt to attack my right and legitimacy to expose indi.padshow. why else would you call me anonymous here ?
is it that you had nothing to do and has a uncotralable desire to write such idiocies in any random blog, perhaps ? is that your explanation?
no, you wanted to defend your filthy master like a faithful slave
admit to clear facts if you can, or choose to live in denial. nobody else will be fooled. you, like all slaves, want to think of themselves free, when you are not .



------------
everyone,
behold liberal lanka making a fool of himself proving that he is indeed a slave and idiot !


this is too funny

I have seen many people trying to inject into your pigeon brain that you are the local palin of conservative politics. Amnesiac, go through your posts and see their opinions, .

lol
basically dog is admitting to his prejudice and slavish mind set .
he thinks i am "local palin of conservative politics" bc "many people" (note the unspecific 'many' ) make unsubstantiated allegations in comments here.
he gives no other reason

what could be more slavish?
you see, he does not have any evidence in the form of quotations to prove that i have written anything against libertarian principles, nor is he able to point to anyone else providing any such evidence. unsubstantiated allegations is enough for a slave .
non slaves, doggy, need more than that .
do you still seriously deny you are a slave after that, mr liberal lanka?

-
when I see you do the next palin I will point it out.
didn't you say earlier that i wrote "conservative crap, corrupting the idea of libertarianism"?
why the future tense now? bc past proves conclusively that i have done no such thing? lol
why not admit that you have nothing to back your claim ? or did your master forbid you to admit it even though it is clear ? are you going to obey your master, slave? or disobey and admit you were wrong?
-

in these comments of liberal lanka , we see why a slave in spirit like him, his mind bound to prejudices and his master, is totally unable to engage in rational argument. that is why these disgusting dogs should be treated with the contempt they richly deserve and kicked in ass each time they make their appearance asking for more and more humiliation.

SL1st said...

S/Nut, that last part from Liberal Lanka about your having to submit to his thinking because some others are saying what he says is telling. No persuasion with supporting facts or through reasoning needed! "They tell me, I follow!" I did not need anything more to convince me where he comes from.

Mr Liberal Lanka, since you follow Unknown Others on trust, would you follow me? Would you please go and annoy Indi now? I think I will say it like this, "Now Go and Annoy Indi. That is an Order!"

sittingnut said...

lol
thanks a lot sl1st.

Liberal Lanka said...

Here's a reminder what happened nano brain, you accused me of defending indi, which I have never done here or anywhere else, then when i asked to prove your accusation you used the filth you are famous for on me. Your amnesia is getting on my nerves. If you can't show me where I have defended any accusation you have leveled at indi shut your filth hole, that is all I asked you.

asshole, why do you forget this all the time, getting your name through mail doesn't change that fact that your blog is an anonymous one. If it is not you will have to write down your name somewhere in your blog, otherwise it is anonymous.

//whether or not i am using a pseudo name is irrelevant to all that[arguments i am making and facts i expose] .//

Did I say it is relevant, you palin brained idiot.

//why the future tense now?//

Every where in this post I told that i will point out when you write next time. Been the dumb offspring of palin you can't even judge a future tense from a past tense.

But you do write, others have pointed out in many occasions just to hear your filth. Why should I make the same points which others have raised successfully just be ignorantly refused by you? That is why I told you I will point it out next time.

Like I said, if I have defended any accusation you have leveled at indi show me, otherwise stop directing your filth at me.

Just try to somehow inject this into your pigeon brain, I can't repeat the same thing just to hear some filth which has no relevance, while you do it I will expose what kind of a hypocrite you are on my next comment, till then bye.

@SL1st
If you a real entity, I think I answered you as well. :)

Liberal Lanka said...

I didn't want to take this, this far. But been rude filth mouthed person you are, you couldn't refuse the temptation to attack me.

You are a dick headed, lying, hypocrite offspring of palin. All along you said that you would keep your real name private to your self.

//just mal
as i said i would like to keep my real name private. :-)//

That is what you said earlier posts

//my full real name is easily obtainable ( from me on reciprocal basis through email //

Now you say that.

What kind of hypocrite son of a palin are you to change words like that?

sittingnut said...

indi padashow's lapdog liberal lanka is making the same idiotic argument which were long refuted again and again . that is of course what we can expect from a slave
so i will merely list the counter arguments that he has not been able to reply to in any rational way

he says he has not defended indi,
but as already pointed out he made several futile attacks on my right and legitimacy to expose indi by falsely claiming i am anonymous regardless of evidence to the contrary. that is defending indi ,


he keeps on repeating this " you are anonymous" claim even though my name is easily available ( unlike his btw) like a wound up doll and yes a slave .

and yes i like to keep my real name private and use a consistent pseudo name which goes back to early 1990s, but full name is easily available to anyone who needs it, from me on a reciprocal basis or through other means easily without my help. that is what i said from the start here on the blog. that is clear in the exchange with justmal that he partially quotes from...i have already linked to that thread above . but here is the link again.
this slave who is unable to show the same openness and transparency, claims that i am hypocritical bc of that . how ? does he know the meaning of hypocritical? where have i said one thing and acted differently? he seems to have lost all sense of logic .

nor has he been able explain why he is here (on this thread of a post where i expose indi. padshow) , with his irrational moronic comments and attacks against me, if not to defend indi padashow and his cronies. that is defending indi

and bc his all his comments are irrational and idiotic and he comes back for more humiliation every time he get his butt kicked here, we can justly say he is showing signs of slave mentality

-
this unthinking ignorant moronic slave mentality of his was further made clear when he was unable to produce any quotation from me to back up his off topic claim that what i write is against libertarian principles .

i will say that again,-
if written , quote .
this slave is clearly not able to do that.

so he takes refuge behind unspecific others, who according to him have allegedly "pointed out in many occasions" "successfully" that i have done so again he is unable to point out where this has happed ,
if successfully done , point where,
give the name of the post and date if he is ignorant and cannot link
this slave is clearly not able to do that.

-

bc of all these actions of his it is clear that when i call this "liberal lanka" a moronic slave or cur of indi padashow. i am perfectly justified in doing so . he well and truly deserve the filth he gets from me or others. he has not been able to make a single rational arguments that he does no deserve whatt he gets here.

Liberal Lanka said...

The moronic offspring of palin managed to come with a sheepish reply after a few hours, but again only manages to throw some more filth. This moron thinks I am defending indi when on reality I am defending myself here. Can't even derive that, poor thing.

Since you are unable to show me once where I have defended any accusations you have leveled at indi, your accusation of me been a slave of indi proves to be a wrong. Only a moron like palin would fail to understand that.

//and yes i like to keep my real name private//

//but full name is easily available to anyone who needs it//

The dung headed follower of palin can't even understand he is contradicting himself here.

//why the future tense now?//

This mother of all liars asked me this, I asked him to show me where I used the past tense he is referring. He was unable to do so, poor thing, must be humiliating.

Finally I understood why this blog is on the blogroll of jathika chinthana pravahaya, good luck on your moronic friendship, master palin.

sittingnut said...

liberal lanka again fails to reply to specific arguments made , and keep on repeating the same moronic already refuted arguments .

these are some of the argument that he fails to reply to ( you may find more details about them in my earlier comments)

1/
he is denying he is not defending indi .padshow but he is doing just that by attacking my right and legitimacy to expose indi by falsely calling me "anonymous". so far he has been unable make a rational argument why that does not amount to defending indi.

2/
he is denying he is not defending indi .padshow when that is the sole purpose of his posting ( moronic and irrational ) comments here in the first place . why else is he here attacking me in in this thread exposing indi padashow .

his latest moronic clam that he is only defending himself is not valid. any need to defend himself arose bc he was defending indi in the first place. to put it another way, need for him to shout he is not a slave, arose bc he was acting like a slave here in the first place

3/
he repeats "you are anonymous " when i am clearly not . he cannot explain how a person can be anonymous when the full real name is easily available .

his latest moronic claim is that my liking to keep name private but still offering it to anyone who needs it, is contradictory. how so? there is no contradiction there. people may prefer one thing but willing to override that if there is a need ( and have done so ). what is the contradiction ? he obviously has no grasp of logic and do not know what 'contradiction' means.

4/
he said i have written against libertarian principles but is unable to quote one sentence from me to prove that.
if written. quote


his latest moronic claim here is that he never said i have written ( past tense ) and he only object to my doing so in the future.
if it is my future sentences he is objecting to, shouldn't he wait until that happens? why is he shouting here that i "write conservative crap, corrupting the idea of libertarianism on the process" if i have not done so yet ? he has no answer to that.

5/
he takes refuge from his inability defend 4 above by saying unspecified "many others" have "successfully" "pointed out in many occasions" that i have written against libertarian principles. but he is unable to to be specific and point out where that has occurred .
if "successful" , be specific and point where, why hide success?


6/
he says he is not a slave of indi padshow and that "filth" he gets from me and others is undeserved, when his actions, his irrational idotic comments , his continuing reappearances here to be humiliated , all indicate he is in fact a slave of indi and is justly deserving of the contempt we feel and show for him.

he will no doubt prove the last point yet again by posting another comment that does not rationally address the arguments i made here,. but merely show his unthinking, ignorant, zombie, like devotion to serving his master indi . like master like slave.

or will he run away like a cur ?lol

mixedblessings89 said...

Hi!

It's been a while since I've been here... got lost.

Anyway, I completely agree, BTW...

err... you seem to not be in a good mood, or so the thread suggests... *ducks for cover*

Anonymous said...

@mixed blessings

Woodpecker has finally found the banana tree.

sittingnut said...

mixedblessings89
was not able to visit you too. i was busy..
:-)

anon
:-)

Anonymous said...

@sitting nut
oops. I meant it like, sitting nut the Woodpecker finally found the banana tree. Sorry if it confused you.

You both are idiots, trying to prove us who the bigger one is.

sittingnut said...

yes i understood. that you were unable to make a coherent argument with specifics about what banana tree i got my alleged beak trapped and hiding behind a general overused cliché.
that is why i smiled :-)
what else to do with likes of you huh?

Liberal Lanka said...

@sittingnut

So you had to challenge me huh? In a blog that had no relevance to here. Since it looks like you haven't understood me there, i just tried to point out that you just cannot be a fool who would believe everything the political circles want the public to believe. You can even discover libertarian politicians whom everyone else think as nut cases :)

I went away because it looked like you started to copy and paste same comments without even bothering to read my replies. I replied to all your 6 arguments. For a moment I thought I was talking to a loud speaker :)

So here is another try.

As I said and you have forgotten, I didn't attack you until you started using your foul language on me. So to say that I attacked you to stop you from attacking indi is false. see my first comment to you and your first comment to me. Who started first using foul language against whom?

Then there is the challenge i put forward you keep conveniently forgetting. If I have defended any accusation you have leveled against indi show me, otherwise the reason this argument took off, the allegation by you that I am a slave of indi proves to be wrong so that should be the end of the argument. It is proven beyond doubt that I am not guilty of your accusation.

@anon
yes I know how this looks like :(

sittingnut said...

as anyone can see liberal lanka is unable to answer any of the 6 arguments made in a rational manner . his moronic claim that he is not defending indi bc he has not "defended any accusation you have leveled against indi " has already been dealt with in argument no 1. and 2; he has defended indi.padashow by denying my right to expose indi by falsely calling me "anonymous" and by posting silly irrational comments in a post dealing with indi padashow .

so here are the 6 arguments again, that liberal lanka slave of indi padashow, is unable to answer in case he will come to his senses and try to answer them
==
these are some of the argument that he fails to reply to ( you may find more details about them in my earlier comments)

1/
he is denying he is not defending indi .padshow but he is doing just that by attacking my right and legitimacy to expose indi by falsely calling me "anonymous". so far he has been unable make a rational argument why that does not amount to defending indi.

2/
he is denying he is not defending indi .padshow when that is the sole purpose of his posting ( moronic and irrational ) comments here in the first place . why else is he here attacking me in in this thread exposing indi padashow .

his latest moronic clam that he is only defending himself is not valid. any need to defend himself arose bc he was defending indi in the first place. to put it another way, need for him to shout he is not a slave, arose bc he was acting like a slave here in the first place

3/
he repeats "you are anonymous " when i am clearly not . he cannot explain how a person can be anonymous when the full real name is easily available .

his latest moronic claim is that my liking to keep name private but still offering it to anyone who needs it, is contradictory. how so? there is no contradiction there. people may prefer one thing but willing to override that if there is a need ( and have done so ). what is the contradiction ? he obviously has no grasp of logic and do not know what 'contradiction' means.

4/
he said i have written against libertarian principles but is unable to quote one sentence from me to prove that.
if written. quote


his latest moronic claim here is that he never said i have written ( past tense ) and he only object to my doing so in the future.
if it is my future sentences he is objecting to, shouldn't he wait until that happens? why is he shouting here that i "write conservative crap, corrupting the idea of libertarianism on the process" if i have not done so yet ? he has no answer to that.

5/
he takes refuge from his inability defend 4 above by saying unspecified "many others" have "successfully" "pointed out in many occasions" that i have written against libertarian principles. but he is unable to to be specific and point out where that has occurred .
if "successful" , be specific and point where, why hide success?


6/
he says he is not a slave of indi padshow and that "filth" he gets from me and others is undeserved, when his actions, his irrational idotic comments , his continuing reappearances here to be humiliated , all indicate he is in fact a slave of indi and is justly deserving of the contempt we feel and show for him.

he will no doubt prove the last point yet again by posting another comment that does not rationally address the arguments i made here,. but merely show his unthinking, ignorant, zombie, like devotion to serving his master indi . like master like slave.

or will he run away like a cur ?lol

Ghazala Khan said...

Interview Request

Hello Dear and Respected,
I hope you are fine and carrying on the great work you have been doing for the Internet surfers. I am Ghazala Khan from The Pakistani Spectator (TPS), We at TPS throw a candid look on everything happening in and for Pakistan in the world. We are trying to contribute our humble share in the webosphere. Our aim is to foster peace, progress and harmony with passion.

We at TPS are carrying out a new series of interviews with the notable passionate bloggers, writers, and webmasters. In that regard, we would like to interview you, if you don't mind. Please send us your approval for your interview at my email address "ghazala.khi at gmail.com", so that I could send you the Interview questions. We would be extremely grateful.

regards.

Ghazala Khan
The Pakistani Spectator
http://www.pakspectator.com

Anonymous said...

Thank you.

1. for naming people

2. for being politically incorrect

3. for being patriotic when the the word it self is considered a taboo amongst certain bloggers.

4. for telling it lilke it is.

5. for not becoming a part of the inner circle of bloggers who promote the peaceniks.

6. Not sweet talking the girl blogs and saying "oh, you write so beautifully, honey"

7. Simply for being the unique you.

When eveyone around you is being
led by $$$ and self promotion,
If you can hold you chin high
and kick them in the balls,
son you shall remain a man.

disaster preparedness said...

That is very unfortunate that there are refugees in the same country. Very informative and interesting article. thanks for the post