Saturday, November 21, 2009

still no explanation or retraction from dinidu de alwis

have never blogged about dinidu de alwis here before (bc he never has anything interesting or original to say), but since he attacked me in a blog post today while leaving out most of the facts, here is the full story for anyone interested (why?) and for any future reference.

in the last blog post in his old blog he falsely attributed a quotation on me. i asked for an explanation and a retraction.

he provided neither (so typical of certain kind of person).
just as tellingly, while attacking me today, he never refers to my demand.

anyway to continue,
he also deleted his old blog (which notoriously celebrated the terrorist air attacks) the same day i asked for an explanation. when asked why he deleted the old blog, he said in an email that his employment contract prevented him from blogging under his name. he has given other explanations to others. furthermore his new blog is linked to his twitter which is in his name. ( btw in spite of all that, i am not linking to his new blog bc of what he said in email, but interested readers can easily find his blog by a simple search and two clicks using his own links)

as everyone who read this blog knows, i don't give up when i am falsely attacked (unlike him it seems; he goes to a doctor! but then, he is never attacked falsely and probably never had anything of worth to defend )

so once in a while when he blogs, esp ( but not necessarily) when he assumes an air of objectivity or moral superiority, i do post comments asking him not to be a liar. he of course censors them (as he has a right to do in his blog). but his patience ran out and he decided to publish my comment yesterday and turned bitchy (with some help from padashow blog. oh my!).

i replied accordingly (guess how nice i would be when padashow is involved!) . he published some of the replies and posted a blog post, attacking me (lol), and basically asking to be left alone in his (public!) blog. he says he will censor my comments, when he has already done that all along. (as he has a right to do, as i said before)

btw he in his attacks perhaps unwittingly (though given that he stoops to borrow even from padashow blog, i doubt that) almost repeats what morquendi said in his last attacks on me in 2006. look what that did to morquendi! i am still here, blogging, he is where?

that's the whole story.

i am still demanding and waiting for an explanation and a retraction.

btw no 'hugs' until then. :-)



ps
he calls me an anonymous blogger. in fact my real name is on display here (in non text format) . and i give (and have given) it to anyone who asks for it. why i don't want it displayed in text format, i have explained where it is displayed.

my twitter - http://twitter.com/sittingnut
this blog's twitter - http://twitter.com/llibertarian


13 comments:

SL1st said...

He is trash. Don't waste anything on him.

Morquandi will reappear now. Want to bet?

sittingnut said...

you are right that he is trash but i thought i would do well to put the whole record out.
before this i have said my side in comments, but never here in a blog post.
now there is a record. now ppl like drummerboy if they want to appear honest and fair before attacking me( for whatever reason as they have done before) , either cannot use dinidu de alwis or must explain away this record.

they cannot no longer pretend to be ignorant.

sittingnut said...

don't know if above is the real liar. but i don't think it is incompatible with is character or his past actions to post here while saying he already said he is not visiting.

lol@ the bitchy liar .

i will let the link stand unless he confirms it is not his comment.

in any case as i said in post his new blog can be found easily through a google search for name bc he himself provides connecting links.

NB said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Ha ha you two are really funny. Like a broken romance. Hate each other but can't stop writing about each other as well. Actually this is better from your part to do cute posts such as this rather than talk about things you don't understand and make a complete mockery of yourself as you do from time to time.

sittingnut said...

nb:
look who is talking


anon 11/23/2009 12:46 pm:

you of course unable to give one example of my writing about things i don't know, bc if you did you will find that i was in fact right about things i write about (mainly bc i stick to facts and reason) .

that is also why you cannot challenge me on threads of those posts pointing out things i get wrong

:-)

sittingnut said...

i am told by email that comment under "nb" linked to http://www.nibrasbawa.com/
ids not by nibras bawa.

i will try to confirm the email before deleting.

Indi said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
sittingnut said...

following comment which i don't believe to be by indi was deleted/edited ( see ps in main post)
==========

Indi said...

Pakaya (name).

11/25/2009 12:11 PM

Anonymous said...

Hoo Hoo Indi or not, you're real Pakaya thamai machang.

sittingnut said...

obviously some fools can't even get their abuse vocabulary straight. :-)

Morq said...

I'm still here you moron.

SL1st said...

I told you that the fool will reappear!