Wednesday, April 26, 2006

sittingnut the retarded king of trinco explains to morquendi real slowly

retard and king of trinco are morquendi 's names for me. i have thanked him for them :-)

morquendi having failed utterly to come up with valid arguments to counter the questions and arguments regarding the biased and plagiarized cpa report on trinco riot in either of those threads or at moju was reduced to creating several posts in nittewa with some juvenile argument about my going to trinco which i have already answered. since i am tired of making the same argument in several places i will post my last comment to his last post here and i will refer to it in the future when he creates the next post.

if yo prefer you may skip it without loss.

here is the comment
-
how pathetic can you be! is this the only one ngo wallahs can put forward ?

you claim to be a journalist and still fail to understand the basics of journalism.
since you are obsessed with my going to trinco and devotes a whole post to that argument (which btw show how you are unable to answer the valid questions or arguments about the biased and plagiarized report from centre for policy alternatives.) i will spell it out to you and what is more i will post it as a post so i dont have to makes it again and again as you continue to repeat it.

i did go to trinco on 16th and yes my employees and friends were eyewitnesses but that does not make me or my accounts of their experience any more believable to others. to do that i have to produce those witnesses to other people's scrutiny. i am not in a position to do that . as such i have no right to ask people to believe in a report based on those unsubstantiated accounts. since when i write i hope to be believed i do not write such a report. i am certainly not going to pass judgment on others using such unsubstantiated accounts either

what is true about me is also true about others. if they cannot produce witnesses and evidence to other's scrutiny they should refrain from producing reports and passing judgment. if they do and do not produce the evidence when challenged, they open themselves to charges of unprofessional conduct. that is what your friends did with that report, they passed judgement on the military based on nothing.

what is more their account differs from all substantiated accounts of the trinco riot published in local and foreign media with evidence. and as i have shown from its internal evidence it was biased in the extreme. this is not surprising since there were also questions about representativeness of those taking part and the methods used to collect the 'facts'.

in addition to all that it has been shown with examples from the text itself that the said report was nothing but a plagiarism of a post by pro ltte blogger jeyaraj.

as i said you failed to come up with counter argments for any of those arguments raised by me even in moju so yo come up with this. :-)

anyway i am glad that you got your juvenile fun. you are right you did not say i was a 'retard' you just posted it and as you know very well i thanked you for it

so thank you again. do call me whatever name you want. you are even free to believe whatever you think of me, i don't mind.

btw i did not know ppl look for popularity in blogs. do you ? that may explain lot of things :-D

1 comment:

Exc said...

Morquendi is a total fuckwit. We all know that.