any one trying to force a ceasefire with ltte terrorists in
sri lanka at this point of time is
no friend of sri lanka and is
supporting our murderers.
such coercion amount to an act of aggression.and
their agents here should feel proportionate retaliation.
i don't care who it is. they never lifted a finger to help us when we,
sri lankans, who want a peace free of terrorists, were being murdered in mass by the
ltte tamil tiger terrorists, including during past ceasefires. so they have no right whatsoever to say we cannot protect ourselves when we are defeating terrorists with our own efforts with no help to speak of.
our best and most moral course of action at this point is to defeat ltte pussies who are nothing but a bunch of criminals (and do not represent
tamils in any way) using military violence as needed (while of course trying to minimize the number of inevitable casualties among the human shields held by the terrorists). that is the only way to get a
sustainable peace.
human rights, justice, freedom and democracy all demand that.
ltte and all those things are completely incompatible. anyone who says otherwise is willfully blind.
if anyone outside try to coerce us from that course (motivated primarily as in case of
british labor government in order to pander to racists in
uk tamil diaspora ), i think we should not hesitate to retaliate against their agents here proportionately.
we should not stand idly by while force is used against us. if they use force, including such as any kind of sanctions, those aggressors' agents here who advocated and lobbied for such a course of action from their foreign masters, and refuse to unconditionally renounce their received blood money and unconditionally denounce their masters' use of force against
sri lanka should suffer for it.
words to note here are force and coercion. mere advocacy of ceasefire can be tolerated ( not of course seriously listened to). that is simply totally worthless bad advice. but if that satisfies some local constituency in those countries, let them have their hot air, while we articulate our case. but if they go beyond that and use force ( including any kind of sanctions) that is a different thing.
sri lanka should not be passive but assertive. we should not obey commands (no matter who gives the commands ) if they are against our interests and our rights. esp when to obey means giving up our most basic
rights including our right to live freely.
i repeat if any kind of force is used against sri lanka, we should not allow the aggressors' paid agents here to operate freely. they and theirs should suffer proportionate retaliation.෴
