Showing posts with label itak. Show all posts
Showing posts with label itak. Show all posts

Thursday, January 01, 2015

reason tna openly endorsed sirisena

why did racist party tamil national alliance(tna) openly endorse maithripala sirisena instead of tacitly supporting him as they have done so far? they intended to continue with tacit support from beginning to end, given the obvious backslash their overt support it will have on sirisena's southern support.

answer is, tna knew there was a high chance of voter indifference to both candidates, and thus low voter turnout in north. whole election campaign calculation of so called common opposition candidate is based  on garnering maximum number of votes from variety of fringe and marginal groups with contradictory ideologies, goals, and aspirations. fatal problem with this strategy is that, while in order to pander to such disparate groups the candidate has to be a vague nebulous object (natural role for cipher sirisena), such marginal groups care a great deal about what they want and demand concrete details, clarity, and trust, to participate in any meaningful way.

in case of tamil racists, sirisena is not offering anything to them openly that will motivate them to vote for him. in fact he is rejecting even alleged secret understandings and agreements. with only tna's tacit support and no open campaigning or organizational clout before, and on day of, election, there was real possibility that mahinda will actually win in north with low turnout of tna voters. remember that tamil parties supporting mahinda got 25%+ support even when tna was going all out against him and tna was much more popular with tamils. 

so in order to organize, and get out their supporters to vote, and even to provide observers for sirisena in polling booths on election day, tna had to drop its mask

however, whether open support at party leadership level will translate into actual grass root organizing and votes is yet to be seen. especially given the rejection and denial of actual open written agreements required for actual work. 

in contrast, as a result of tna's open endorsement, there is no doubt about the reduction in support from variety of groups for sirisena; centrists who reject racist parties gaining power, sinhala buddhist racist fundamentalists, victims of tna's former masters tiger terrorist pussies, etc, etc. some people in these groups who may have thought sirisena a viable pragmatic democratic alternative to mahinda before tna endorsement have changed their minds. 

imo, with racist tna support, sirisena will probably win in north, but with much smaller margins in smaller vote turnouts (in places with comparatively smaller populations to begin with ) than he would require in order  to offset the big margins of victory mahinda will post in more populous south.   



my twitter - http://twitter.com/sittingnut
this blog's twitter - http://twitter.com/llibertarian



Sunday, September 22, 2013

will tamil nationalists and their western backers face facts?

yesterday's elections for northern provincial council resulted in the expected victory for ilankai tamil arasu kadchi(itak) also called tamil national alliance(tna). it is a mixed group of tamil nationalist politicians  from moderates to despicable extremely violent racists including those who were allied to now defeated tiger terrorists.

question that matter is not the results, but what happens now.

will the tamil nationalists have the courage and pragmatism to face facts below(as almost all other sri lankans have already done);

that so called 'oppressors' and 'prosecutors' of tamils(that is sri lankans in general as represented by government) were not bent of oppression. but were perfectly willing to and did hold a truly free and fair election. 

that such an election was only possible after the military defeat of tamil tigers(ltte).

that in contrast, tigers, when they had power, insisted on being the sole representative of tamils, and killed and oppressed and prosecuted fellow tamils who even hinted at independent opinion(not to mention other sri lankans). 

that defeat of tigers and holding of free elections was a great and praiseworthy leap for human rights and reconciliation in sri lanka.  

that way forward in any direction requires, not confrontation and slander, but pragmatic engagement with sri lanka's democratic government.
will tamil nationalists face these facts and acknowledge them? 
will they have the courage to push aside the extreme racists who prefer to remain blind to them (and prefer violence)?

will western hypocrites preaching to sri lanka about human rights and reconciliation face these facts, and acknowledge and support sri lanka's solid progress instead of prejudging us based on  unsubstantiated allegations spread by racists(both tamil and western)?

we, sri lankans, have acted to secure democracy and human rights by defeating tigers and holding free elections. as always we will continue to do everything to foster democracy and human rights without prompting.
it up to all, including tamil nationalists, to join this effort in peace, and renounce violence and slanders. 
it is in the interest of west and other foreign governments, to help us continue in the same road,  renouncing hypocritical preaching and counter productive attempts at coercion.

whatever happens we will remain a democratic free society. and anyone who tries to undermine it with violence and coercion should be and would be defeated, as tiger scum were.


ps.
in elections held in north western and central provinces governing upfa is winning handsomely, as expected, even without some of its coalition partners. those coalition parties also got seats and will rejoin in administration if upfa will let them. unp is in a pathetic state as usual. jvp is finished.
 
my twitter - http://twitter.com/sittingnut
this blog's twitter - http://twitter.com/llibertarian
 

Sunday, August 09, 2009

uva provincial council, jaffna & vavuniya local council, election results online

according to tradition of this blog, i will publish the election results of uva provincial council , jaffna municipal council, and vavuniya urban council, election results on one page.

all results are linked to election department website, where you can find the official results of each with much more details if needed.

uva provincial council
result
upfa
unp
jvp
other
badulla



mahiyangana39, 909
12,013
1,943
303
wiyaluwa20,433
7,437
564
631
passara23,959
9,736
540
2,590
badulla21,386
12,084
628
1,027
hali-ela27,088
10,653
728
1,771
uva-paranagama24,569
12,036
1,525
638
welimada29,431
11,862
1,114
2,237
bandarawela33,702
12,821
819
2,805
haputale26,471
7,765
603
2,291
badulla postal
12,121
2,228
543
157
-
-
-
-
-
final badulla tot
259,069
98,635
9,007
15,449
percentage68%
26%
2%
4%
badulla dist. elected seats (21)14
5
1
1
-
-
-
-
-
moneragala



bibila 36,499
6,503
1,699
156
moneragala
49,420
9,187
1,208
236
wellawaya66,842
14,026
2,491
211
moneragala postal7,076
793
234
4
-
-
-
-
-
moneragala final total159,837
30,509
5,632
571
percentage81%
16%
3%
-%
moneragala dist. elected seats (11)
9
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
final full total
418,906
129,144
14,639
16,020
total percentage
72%
22%
3%
3%
total seats (32)
(w/o bonus seats)
23
7
1
1
total seats (34)25
7
1
1


"other" seat in badulla went to up-country people's front who got 9,227(2%) votes.

jaffna municipal council

result
upfa
itak
tulf
other
total votes
10,602
8,008
1,007
1,305
percentage51%
38%
5%
6%
total seats (23)
(including bonus seats)
13
8
1
1


"other" seat went to independnt group 1 who got 1,175(6%) votes.


vavuniya urban council

result
upfa
itak
dplf
other
total votes
3,045
4,279
4,136
832
percentage25%
35%
34%
6%
total seats (11)
(including bonus seats)

2
5
3
1


"other" seat went to sri lanka muslim congress who got 587(5%) votes.

sorry about the colors some of the colors i want to use clash with blog colors